Commissioner of Income-tax v. Kanel Oil and Export Industries Ltd
[Citation -2014-LL-1205-84]

Citation 2014-LL-1205-84
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax
Respondent Name Kanel Oil and Export Industries Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 05/12/2014
Assessment Year 1996-97
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags profits and gains of business or profession • business of manufacturing and sale • earning interest income • rent • depb
Bot Summary: The assessee firm is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of castor oil in tehlocal as well as export markets. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessing officer noticed that the assessee had claimed deduction u/s 80IA of I.T Act in respect of purchase, sale and resale of castor seeds and castor oil. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim of the assessee for deduction u/s 80IA treating it as other income. On appeal before the Tribunal, by impugned order, the Tribunal reversed the order of CIT(A) and directed the Assessing Officer to exclude the net interest income. The issue involved in the present Tax Appeal is now not res integra in view of the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of ACG Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT reported in 2012 343 ITR 89 wherein the Hon ble Supreme Court has held that for the purpose of Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 it is not the entire amount received by the assessee on sale of DEPB credit but the sale value less the face value of the DEPB that will represent profit on transfer of DEPB credit by the assessee. Having heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the parties and the question posed for consideration before us reproduced hereinabove and considering the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of ACG Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd, the question which is raised in the present appeal is required to be answered in favour of the assessee. We are not giving any elaborate reasons for the same as in the case of ACG Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd it is held by the Hon ble Supreme Court that ninety percent of not the gross rent or gross interest but only the net interest or net rent which had been included in the profits of business of the assessee as computed under the head Profits and gains of business or profession was to be deducted under clause of Explanation to section 80HHC for determining the profits of the business.


IN HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 1121 of 2006 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2 To be referred to Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see fair copy of judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves substantial question of law as to interpretation of Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to civil judge ? COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX....Appellant(s) Versus KANEL OIL AND EXPORT INDUSTRIELTD.....Opponent(s) Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE for Appellant(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Opponent(s) No. 1 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER Page 1 of 4 Downloaded on : Tue Aug 25 14:42:44 IST 2020 O/TAXAP/1121/2006 JUDGMENT Date : 05/12/2014 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI) 1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with impugned judgment and order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench C (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal ) dated 31.10.2005 in ITA No. 320/Ahd/2000 for Assessment Year 1996-97, revenue has preferred present Tax Appeal. 1.1 This appeal was admitted by this Court on 12.02.2007 for consideration of following substantial question of law: Whether Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing Assessing Officer to exclude net interest income i.e. after allowing that interest payment which has been incurred for earning interest income of Rs. 56,22,569? 2. assessee firm is engaged in business of manufacturing and sale of castor oil in tehlocal as well as export markets. During course of assessment proceedings, assessing officer noticed that assessee had claimed deduction u/s 80IA of I.T Act in respect of purchase, sale and resale of castor seeds and castor oil. Assessing Officer rejected claim of assessee for deduction u/s 80IA treating it as other income . On appeal CIT (Appeals) held that there was no ground for excluding interest income for working out deduction u/s 80I of Act. Page 2 of 4 Downloaded on : Tue Aug 25 14:42:44 IST 2020 O/TAXAP/1121/2006 JUDGMENT 3. On appeal before Tribunal, by impugned order, Tribunal reversed order of CIT(A) and directed Assessing Officer to exclude net interest income. 4. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with impugned order passed by Tribunal, revenue has preferred present Tax Appeal for consideration of aforesaid substantial question of law. 5. issue involved in present Tax Appeal is now not res integra in view of decision of Honble Supreme Court in case of ACG Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT reported in [2012] 343 ITR 89 (SC) wherein Hon ble Supreme Court has held that for purpose of Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961 it is not entire amount received by assessee on sale of DEPB credit but sale value less face value of DEPB that will represent profit on transfer of DEPB credit by assessee. It is also held that if any quantum of any receipt of nature mentioned in clause (1) of Explanation (baa) has not been included in profits of business of assessee as computed under head Profits and gains of business or profession , ninety per cent of such quantum of receipt cannot be deducted under Explanation (baa) to section 80HHC. 6. Mr. Manish Bhatt, learned Senior Advocate appearing with Ms. Mauna Bhatt, learned advocate on behalf of revenue is not in position to dispute above and is not in position to show and/or point out any contrary decision. Page 3 of 4 Downloaded on : Tue Aug 25 14:42:44 IST 2020 O/TAXAP/1121/2006 JUDGMENT 7. Having heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of parties and question posed for consideration before us reproduced hereinabove and considering decision of Hon ble Supreme Court in case of ACG Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd (Supra), question which is raised in present appeal is required to be answered in favour of assessee. We are not giving any elaborate reasons for same as in case of ACG Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd (Supra) it is held by Hon ble Supreme Court that ninety percent of not gross rent or gross interest but only net interest or net rent which had been included in profits of business of assessee as computed under head Profits and gains of business or profession was to be deducted under clause (1) of Explanation (baa) to section 80HHC for determining profits of business. Accordingly, question is answered in affirmative i.e. against appellant revenue and in favour of assessee. 8. In view of above, impugned judgment and order passed by Tribunal is confirmed. Hence, present Tax Appeal is dismissed. (K.S.JHAVERI, J.) (K.J.THAKER, J) divya Page 4 of 4 Downloaded on : Tue Aug 25 14:42:44 IST 2020 Commissioner of Income-tax v. Kanel Oil and Export Industries Ltd
Report Error