The Commissioner of Income-tax-­5 v. M/s. Litolier Properties Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2014-LL-1203-5]

Citation 2014-LL-1203-5
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax-­5
Respondent Name M/s. Litolier Properties Pvt. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 03/12/2014
Assessment Year 2006-07
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: The question of law at page 7 of the paper book is termed as om substantial question of law. Mr. Ahuja appearing in support of this appeal very fairly produced for our perusal a copy of an order dated 25 March 2014 in Income Tax Appeal No.112 of 2013. That order decides that such question was repeatedly raised by the Revenue and B concerning the same assessee for Assessment Years 2001 2002, 2002 2003 and 2006 2007. In the present case, the Assessment Year is 2006 2007. In these circumstances, following the Division Bench order in Appeal No.112 of 2013 for same reasons we dismiss this appeal. It has Pg 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 13:53:22 ::: itxa1451 12.doc no merit because it does not raise any substantial question of law.


itxa1451 12.doc sg IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY rt ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ou INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1451 OF 2012 Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Appellant Vs. M/s. Litolier Properties Pvt. Ltd. Respondent C ..... Mr. Abhay Ahuja, for Appellant. h Mr. Pankaj Toprani, for Respondent. . ig CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND S.C. GUPTE, JJ. H DATE : 03 DECEMBER 2014 PC : y . This appeal of Revenue challenges appeal dated 7 March 2012 by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. ba 2. question of law at page 7 of paper book is termed as om substantial question of law. However, Mr. Ahuja appearing in support of this appeal very fairly produced for our perusal copy of order dated 25 March 2014 in Income Tax Appeal No.112 of 2013. That order decides that such question was repeatedly raised by Revenue and B concerning same assessee for Assessment Years 2001 2002, 2002 2003 and 2006 2007. In present case, Assessment Year is 2006 2007. In these circumstances, following Division Bench order in Appeal No.112 of 2013 for same reasons we dismiss this appeal. It has Pg 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 13:53:22 ::: itxa1451 12.doc no merit because it does not raise any substantial question of law. No rt order as to costs. ou (S.C.GUPTE, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) C h ig H y ba om B Pg 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 13:53:22 ::: The Commissioner of Income-tax-­5 v. M/s. Litolier Properties Pvt. Ltd
Report Error