*1* 9.itxa1434.12 sbw IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY rt ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1434 OF 2012 ou Commissioner of Income Tax II Pune. ..Appellant Versus C M/s. Trimurti Developers ..Respondent ........... Mr. Vimal Gupta, Senior Counsel, with Vipul Arun Bajpayee for h Appellant. ig ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND H A. K. MENON, JJ. DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2014 P.C.: y ba 1] Mr. Vimal Gupta, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of Revenue in support of this Appeal submits that questions of law which om arise out of Tribunal's order and which have been formulated at page 8, 9 and 10 of paper book, are all answered by common judgments and which have been delivered by us on 19 th September, 2014 in Income B Tax Appeal No.201 of 2012 in case of Commissioner of Income Tax 16 V/s. M/s. Happy Home Enterprises and in Income Tax Appeal No.308 of 2012 in case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Central II, Mumbai V/s. M/s. Kanakia Spaces Pvt. Ltd. 1/2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 10:57:00 ::: *2* 9.itxa1434.12 2] questions have been answered in favour of Assessee and rt against Revenue. In view thereof, Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. ou C (A. K. MENON, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) h ig H wadhwa y ba om B 2/2 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2015 10:57:00 ::: The Commissioner of Income Tax­-II, Pune v. M/s. Trimurti Developer