Commissioner of Income-tax-2, Mumbai v. HDFC Bank Ltd
[Citation -2014-LL-0723-49]

Citation 2014-LL-0723-49
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax-2, Mumbai
Respondent Name HDFC Bank Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 23/07/2014
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags substantial question of law
Bot Summary: It is common ground before us that the substantial question of law framed in this Appeal is identical to question A in Income Tax Appeal No.330 of 2012, which has been decided by us today. In view of our judgment in Income Tax Appeal No.330 of 2012 and for the reasons stated therein, we are of the view that even this Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law.


vrd 1 ITXA329/12 IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.329 OF 2012 Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai 400 020 ...Appellant v/s HDFC Bank Ltd. ...Respondent Mr Suresh Kumar for Appellant. Mr J.D. Mistry, Sr. Counsel with Mr Atul Jasani for Respondent. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ. Reserved on : 10th July 2014. Pronounced on : 23rd July 2014. JUDGMENT [ Per B.P. Colabawalla J. ] :- 1. It is common ground before us that substantial question of law framed in this Appeal is identical to question in Income Tax Appeal No.330 of 2012, which has been decided by us today. In view of our judgment in Income Tax Appeal No.330 of 2012 and for reasons stated therein, we are of view that even this Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. In view thereof, Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. ( B.P. COLABAWALLA J. ) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI J. ) ::: Downloaded on - 14/04/2020 12:11:27 ::: Commissioner of Income-tax-2, Mumbai v. HDFC Bank Ltd
Report Error