The Commissioner of Income-tax v. Essar Projects Ltd
[Citation -2013-LL-0708-21]

Citation 2013-LL-0708-21
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax
Respondent Name Essar Projects Ltd.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 08/07/2013
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: The Revenue had filed an appeal bearing Income Tax Appeal No.450 of 2010 against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The High Court had dismissed the appeal by its order dated 22.07.2009. While disposing of the said Special Leave Petition, this Court vide orders dated 10.05.2011 had directed the Revenue to file the Notice of Motion within eight weeks i.e. on or before 5 th July, 2011. In compliance of the orders of this Court dated 10.05.2011, the Revenue has filed the Notice of Motion on 29.07.2011 which was beyond eight weeks time and there was a delay of 24 days in filing the Notice of Motion by the Revenue. Keeping in view the aforesaid aspect of the matter, the High Court has once again rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue. In our view, the High Court ought not to have been too technical in rejecting the Notice of Motion filed by the Revenue, since the Revenue could not obtain the certified copy of the order passed by this Court well within time. We now request the High Court to dispose of the Income Tax Appeal No.450 of 2011 on merits, after affording opportunity of hearing to both the parties.


IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5338 OF 2013 (ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)NO.34192 OF 2012) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ... APPELLANT VERSUS ESSAR PROJECTS LTD. ... RESPONDENT ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. By consent of learned counsel for parties, matter is taken up for final hearing. 3. Revenue had filed appeal bearing Income Tax Appeal No.450 of 2010 against order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. While filing appeal there was delay of one day. High Court had dismissed appeal by its order dated 22.07.2009. 4. appellant was before this Court in S.L.P.(C)No.13872 of 2011 @ CC No.7887 of 2011 against order dated 22.07.2009 of High Court. While disposing of said Special Leave Petition, this Court vide orders dated 10.05.2011 had directed Revenue to file Notice of Motion within eight weeks i.e. on or before 5 th July, 2011. 5. In compliance of orders of this Court dated 10.05.2011, Revenue has filed Notice of Motion on 29.07.2011 which was beyond eight weeks time and there was delay of 24 days in filing Notice of Motion by Revenue. Page 1 : 2 : 6. Keeping in view aforesaid aspect of matter, High Court has once again rejected appeal filed by Revenue. Being aggrieved by said order, Revenue is before us in this Civil Appeal. 7. We have herd learned counsel for parties to lis. 8. In our view, High Court ought not to have been too technical in rejecting Notice of Motion filed by Revenue, since Revenue could not obtain certified copy of order passed by this Court well within time. 9. In that view of matter, we condone delay of 26 days in filing Notice of Motion by Revenue. 10. We now request High Court to dispose of Income Tax Appeal No.450 of 2011 on merits, after affording opportunity of hearing to both parties. 11. Civil Appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Ordered accordingly. ...................J. (H.L. DATTU) ...................J. (DIPAK MISRA) NEW DELHI; JULY 08, 2013 Page 2 Commissioner of Income-tax v. Essar Projects Ltd
Report Error