Kuldeep Bishnoi v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Invetigation) Unit 4(3) & Ors - 2022-LL-0610

Citation	2022-LL-0610
Appellant Name	Kuldeep Bishnoi
Respondent Name	Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Invetigation) Unit 4(3) & Ors.
Court	SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	10/06/2022
Judgment	View Judgment
Bot Summary:	Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that there is already a look-out notice against the petitioner and therefore even if the passport is released in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner shall not be permitted to travel and even otherwise the High Court has given cogent reasons while passing the impugned judgment and order, we see no reason to interfere with the same. It is observed that if there is any extra-ordinary medical urgency which require the operation, it will be open for the petitioner to approach the High Court again and the High Court may consider the same, subject to the pending look-out notice Signature Not Verified against the petitioner.

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10329/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-05-2022 in CMA No. 21499/2022 passed by High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) KULDEEP BISHNOI Petitioner(s) VERSUS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION) UNIT 4(3) & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 10-06-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE (VACATION BENCH) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, AOR Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Hitain Bajaj, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh, ASG Mr. Samarvir Singh, Adv. Mr. Shyam Gopal, Adv. Mr. Naman Tandon, Adv. Mr. Prahlad Singh, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Heard learned counsel appearing for respective parties. In facts and circumstances of case and considering fact that there is already look-out notice against petitioner and therefore even if passport is released in favour of petitioner, petitioner shall not be permitted to travel and even otherwise High Court has given cogent reasons while passing impugned judgment and order, we see no reason to interfere with same. However, it is observed that if there is any extra-ordinary medical urgency which require operation, it will be open for petitioner to approach High Court again and High Court may consider same, subject to pending look-out notice Signature Not Verified against petitioner. Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2022.06.10 14:54:12 IST Reason: Special Leave Petition stands dismissed. (R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Kuldeep Bishnoi v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Invetigation) Unit 4(3) & Or

Metadata

Judgment