PTL Enterprises Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle 4(1)
[Citation -2022-LL-0221]

Citation 2022-LL-0221
Appellant Name PTL Enterprises Ltd.
Respondent Name Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle 4(1)
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 21/02/2022
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags other sources • rental income
Bot Summary: For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER Both the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal as well as the High Court have rightly held that the rental income to be treated as income from other sources. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the ITAT as well as the High Court. On the other two questions/issues also, namely, on quality loss and on penalty/stores and spares , we are in complete agreement with the ITAT as well as the High Court. We see no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order(s) passed by the High Court in exercise of powers under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. 15:21:16 IST Reason: Pending application stands disposed of.


ITEM NO.9 Court 12 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XI-A SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1877-1884/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-07-2021 in ITA No. 193/2012 22-07-2021 in ITA No. 185/2013 22-07-2021 in ITA No. 200/2013 22-07-2021 in ITA No. 206/2013 22-07-2021 in ITA No. 207/2013 22-07-2021 in ITA No. 227/2013 22-07-2021 in ITA No. 92/2014 22-07-2021 in ITA No. 93/2014 passed by High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) M/S PTL ENTERPRISES LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 4(1) Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.17476/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 21-02-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Kavita Jha, AOR Mr. Rohit Jain, Adv. Mr. Aniket D. Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Saksham Singhal, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Both Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) as well as High Court have rightly held that rental income to be treated as income from other sources . We are in complete agreement with view taken by ITAT as well as High Court. On other two questions/issues also, namely, on quality loss and on penalty/stores and spares , we are in complete agreement with ITAT as well as High Court. we see no reason to interfere with impugned judgment and order(s) passed by High Court in exercise of powers under Article 136 of Constitution of India. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2022.02.23 Special Leave Petitions stand dismissed. 15:21:16 IST Reason: Pending application stands disposed of. (R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER PTL Enterprises Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle 4(1)
Report Error