Vimal Tyagi v. Income-tax Officer, Ward 2(5), Ghaziabad and 3 Others
[Citation -2020-LL-0916-37]
Citation | 2020-LL-0916-37 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Vimal Tyagi |
Respondent Name | Income-tax Officer, Ward 2(5), Ghaziabad and 3 Others |
Court | HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 16/09/2020 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | attachment order |
Bot Summary: | Grievance of the petitioner is that even during pendency of her stay application under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the demand has been recovered from the petitioner and the demand recovered may be directed to be returned to the petitioner. The entire demand has already been recovered from the petitioner on 9.6.2020. This writ petition has been filed on 23.7.2020, thus no cause of action was available to the petitioner at the time of filing of the writ petition. Learned counsel for the Income Tax Department further submits that the only relief that can be granted to the petitioner is that her appeal pending before the CIT, Ghaziabad may be directed to be decided within a time bound period. Under the circumstances and to meet the ends of justice and as agreed by the learned counsel for the Department, we direct that the appeal of the petitioner pending before the respondent no. 2- CIT, Ghaziabad may be decided on merits in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within two months from the date of presentation of a copy of this order, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. In result the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. |