N.K.Vinoba v. The Income-tax Officer Income-tax Department, Ward 3, Aluva / The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kochi
[Citation -2020-LL-0817-17]

Citation 2020-LL-0817-17
Appellant Name N.K.Vinoba
Respondent Name The Income-tax Officer Income-tax Department, Ward 3, Aluva / The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kochi
Court HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 17/08/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags stay petition
Bot Summary: 1087 OF 2020 2 JUDGMENT Vinod Chandran, J. Appellant is before us challenging the order of the learned Single Judge, which directed recovery steps to be kept in abeyance on deposit of 10 and also directed consideration of the stay petition by the first Appellate Authority. Writ petitioner is in appeal contending that he has a good prima facie case and there should be complete exemption from recovery when the appeal is pending. We are in appeal and we cannot interfere with the discretion exercised by the learned Single Judge, which we find to be more than reasonable. Learned Single Judge had directed deposit of 10 within a period of one month. Only since an appeal has been filed, the order has not been complied with and hence we extend the time for another 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. In the context of the pandemic, we are of the opinion that the appeal itself could be heard and disposed of WA.No. If the petitioner makes the deposit, recovery will stand stayed till disposal of appeal.


IN HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI MONDAY, 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020 / 26TH SRAVANA, 1942 WA.No.1087 OF 2020 AGAINST JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 9771/2020(V) DT.18.05.2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/PETITIONER: N.K.VINOBA 894A/16/560, NEELIMATHARA HOUSE, KOTTUVALLIKKAD, MOOTHAKUNNAM P.O., MOOTHAKUNNAM, N.PARUR-683516, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 INCOME TAX OFFICER INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, WARD 3, K.A.P COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, OFFICE OF ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALUVA RANGE, R.S.ROAD, ALUVA-683 101. 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAMKULAM, KOCHI-682 036. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC. IT THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.08.2020, COURT ON SAME DAY DELIVERED FOLLOWING: WA.No.1087 OF 2020 2 JUDGMENT Vinod Chandran, J. Appellant is before us challenging order of learned Single Judge, which directed recovery steps to be kept in abeyance on deposit of 10% and also directed consideration of stay petition by first Appellate Authority. Writ petitioner is in appeal contending that he has good prima facie case and there should be complete exemption from recovery when appeal is pending. 2. We are in appeal and we cannot interfere with discretion exercised by learned Single Judge, which we find to be more than reasonable. Learned Single Judge had directed deposit of 10% within period of one month. Only since appeal has been filed, order has not been complied with and hence we extend time for another 30 days from date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment. In context of pandemic, we are of opinion that appeal itself could be heard and disposed of WA.No.1087 OF 2020 3 and there is no requirement as of now to consider stay petition. If petitioner makes deposit, recovery will stand stayed till disposal of appeal. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/- T.R.RAVI JUDGE Pn 05/08 N.K.Vinoba v. Income-tax Officer Income-tax Department, Ward 3, Aluva / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kochi
Report Error