Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai v. Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0813-3]

Citation 2020-LL-0813-3
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai
Respondent Name Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 13/08/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags market development expenses • profit and loss account • monetary limit • tax effect
Bot Summary: This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue, calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, C Bench, ITA No.944/Mds/2013 by raising the following substantial questions of law: 1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in deleting the addition made towards market development expenses to the extent of RS.2. 20 crores out of the total claim of Rs.5.01 crores as against the actual debit of Rs.94.56 lakhs in the profit and loss account and directing the Assessing Officer to verify the remaining portion of RS.2. 81 crores in the light of the ratio laid down in the case of MIs. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding the assessee is eligible for the claim of Rs.2.20 crores as against Rs.94.56 lakhs debited in the profit and loss account without any evidence in support of its claim of Rs.2.20 crores for incurring the expenditure in the year under consideration 3. 266 of 2015 C.I.T vs. Gandhimadhi Appliances Ltd. 3/4 Rs.5.01 crores claimed in its returns 3. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in appropriate cases.


Order dt.13.08.2020 in T.C.A.No.266 of 2015 C.I.T vs. Gandhimadhi Appliances Ltd. 1/4 IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.08.2020 CORAM HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY T.C.A.No.266 of 2015 Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai ... Appellant vs. M/s.Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd. 377, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018 ... Respondent Prayer ::- Appeal filed against order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras C Bench, dated 28.11.2013 in ITA No.944/Mds/2013. For appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan ORDER (Made by DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) Court was held by Video Conference, as per Resolution of Full Court dated 3 July 2020, by Judges at their respective residence and counsel, staff of Court appearing from their respective residences. http://www.judis.nic.in Order dt.13.08.2020 in T.C.A.No.266 of 2015 C.I.T vs. Gandhimadhi Appliances Ltd. 2/4 2. This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by Revenue, calling in question correctness of order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, C Bench, ITA No.944/Mds/2013 by raising following substantial questions of law: "1. Whether in facts and circumstances of case, Tribunal was right in law in deleting addition made towards market development expenses to extent of RS.2.20 crores out of total claim of Rs.5.01 crores as against actual debit of Rs.94.56 lakhs in profit and loss account and directing Assessing Officer to verify remaining portion of RS.2.81 crores in light of ratio laid down in case of MIs. Brilliant Tutorials P Ltd.? 2. Whether in facts and circumstances of case, Tribunal was right in law in holding assessee is eligible for claim of Rs.2.20 crores as against Rs.94.56 lakhs debited in profit and loss account without any evidence in support of its claim of Rs.2.20 crores for incurring expenditure in year under consideration? 3. Whether in facts and circumstances of case, Tribunal was right in directing Assessing officer to enquire and verify details with regard to sum of Rs.2.81 crores when assessing himself has admitted that it is eligible for claim of Rs.2.20 crores only out of sum of http://www.judis.nic.in Order dt.13.08.2020 in T.C.A.No.266 of 2015 C.I.T vs. Gandhimadhi Appliances Ltd. 3/4 Rs.5.01 crores claimed in its returns? 3. When matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel brought to our notice Circular issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by Department before High Court in cases where tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). 4. In instant case, tax effect is said to be less than monetary limit imposed and therefore, Appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open substantial questions of law for determination in appropriate cases. No costs. 5 Registry is directed to send copy of judgment to Respondent / Assessee in address given in Appeal. (V.K.,J.) (K.R.,J.) 13.08.2020 tar DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J. http://www.judis.nic.in Order dt.13.08.2020 in T.C.A.No.266 of 2015 C.I.T vs. Gandhimadhi Appliances Ltd. 4/4 and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. (tar) To M/s.Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd. 377, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018 T.C.A.No.266 of 2015 13.08.2020 http://www.judis.nic.in Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai v. Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd
Report Error