The Commissioner of Income-tax Tamil Nadu VII, Madras v. Aluglass Electricals
[Citation -2020-LL-0806-6]

Citation 2020-LL-0806-6
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax Tamil Nadu VII, Madras
Respondent Name Aluglass Electricals
Court HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 06/08/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags substantial question of law • disallowance of interest • business expenditure • interest payment • monetary limit • tax effect
Bot Summary: Order dt.06.08.2020 in T.C.No. For appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, Sr.Standing Counsel JUDGMENT The Court was held by Video Conference, as per the Resolution of the Full Court dated 3 July 2020, by Judges at their respective residence and the counsel, staff of the Court appearing from their respective residences. In Order dt.06.08.2020 in T.C.No. This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue, calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A Bench, Chennai, dated 9 June 2008, in I.T.A.No. 1768/Mds/2007 by raising the following substantial question of law: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in deleting the disallowance of interest Rs.20,45,578/-, claimed as business expenditure by the Assessee, even though the Assessing Officer made the addition on account of interest payment on borrowed funds 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel brought to our notice the Circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/-. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open the substantial question of law for determination in appropriate cases.


Order dt.06.08.2020 in T.C.No.2021 of 2008 Commr. Of I.T. vs.M/s.Aluglass Electricals 1/4 IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.08.2020 CORAM HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY T.C.A.No.2021 of 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax Tamil Nadu VII, Madras Appellant vs. M/s.Aluglass Electricals, No.60, EVK Sampath Salai, Chennai 600007 Respondent Prayer ::- Appeal filed against order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench, Chennai, dated 09.06.2008 in I.T.A.No.1768/Mds/2007. For appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan, Sr.Standing Counsel JUDGMENT (Made by DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) Court was held by Video Conference, as per Resolution of Full Court dated 3 July 2020, by Judges at their respective residence and counsel, staff of Court appearing from their respective residences. http://www.judis.nic.in Order dt.06.08.2020 in T.C.No.2021 of 2008 Commr. Of I.T. vs.M/s.Aluglass Electricals 2/4 2. This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by Revenue, calling in question correctness of order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench, Chennai, dated 9 June 2008, in I.T.A.No.1768/Mds/2007 by raising following substantial question of law: ""Whether on facts and in circumstances of case Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in deleting disallowance of interest Rs.20,45,578/-, claimed as business expenditure by Assessee, even though Assessing Officer made addition on account of interest payment on borrowed funds?" 3. When matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel brought to our notice Circular issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by Department before High Court in cases where tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). 4. In instant case, tax effect is said to be less than monetary limit imposed and therefore, Appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open substantial question of law for determination in appropriate cases. No costs. http://www.judis.nic.in Order dt.06.08.2020 in T.C.No.2021 of 2008 Commr. Of I.T. vs.M/s.Aluglass Electricals 3/4 5. Registry is directed to send copy of judgment to Respondent/Assessee in address given in Appeal. (V.K.,J.) (K.R.,J.) 06.08.2020 kpl/tar To M/s.Aluglass Electricals, No.60, EVK Sampath Salai, Chennai 600 007 http://www.judis.nic.in Order dt.06.08.2020 in T.C.No.2021 of 2008 Commr. Of I.T. vs.M/s.Aluglass Electricals 4/4 DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J. and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. (tar) T.C.A.No.2021 of 2008 06.08.2020 http://www.judis.nic.in Commissioner of Income-tax Tamil Nadu VII, Madras v. Aluglass Electrical
Report Error