Principal Commissioner of Income-tax 4, Chennai v. Olympus Elevator Private Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0804-4]

Citation 2020-LL-0804-4
Appellant Name Principal Commissioner of Income-tax 4, Chennai
Respondent Name Olympus Elevator Private Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 04/08/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags monetary limit • education cess • mat credit • tax effect • surcharge
Bot Summary: Order dt.04.08.2020 in T.C.A.No. For Appellant :: Mr.T. Ravikumar, Sr.Standing Counsel For Respondent :: Ms.Srini Ranjani Srinivasan for Mr.G.Baskar ORDER The Court was held by Video Conference, as per the Resolution of the Full Court dated 3 July 2020, by Judges at their respective residence and the counsel, staff of the Court appearing from their respective residences. In Order dt.04.08.2020 in T.C.A.No. This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue, calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras A Bench by raising the following substantial question of law: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Tribunal was correct and justified in directing the Assessing Officer to allow MAT credit u/s 115JAA of the Act including surcharge and cess when surcharge and education cess are not admissible for claim of credit as per provisions of the section 115JAA of the Income Tax Act 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel brought to our notice the Circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/-. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in appropriate cases.


Order dt.04.08.2020 in T.C.A.No.335 of 2017 1/4 IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.08.2020 CORAM HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY T.C.A.No.335 of 2017 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4 NO.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai 600 034. ... appellant Vs. M/s.Olympus Elevator Private Ltd., by L/R. M/s.Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd., NO.50-55, Vanagaram Road, Ayanambakkam, Chennai 600 095. ... respondent Prayer: Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras "A" Bench, dated 26.10.2016 in ITA.No.2217/Mds/2015. For Appellant :: Mr.T. Ravikumar, Sr.Standing Counsel For Respondent :: Ms.Srini Ranjani Srinivasan for Mr.G.Baskar ORDER (Made by DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) Court was held by Video Conference, as per Resolution of Full Court dated 3 July 2020, by Judges at their respective residence and counsel, staff of Court appearing from their respective residences. http://www.judis.nic.in Order dt.04.08.2020 in T.C.A.No.335 of 2017 2/4 2. This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by Revenue, calling in question correctness of order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras Bench by raising following substantial question of law: " Whether on facts and circumstances of case and in law, Tribunal was correct and justified in directing Assessing Officer to allow MAT credit u/s 115JAA of Act "including surcharge and cess" when surcharge and education cess are not admissible for claim of credit as per provisions of section 115JAA of Income Tax Act? 3. When matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel brought to our notice Circular issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by Department before High Court in cases where tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). http://www.judis.nic.in Order dt.04.08.2020 in T.C.A.No.335 of 2017 3/4 4. In instant case, tax effect is said to be less than monetary limit imposed and therefore, Appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn, keeping open substantial questions of law for determination in appropriate cases. No costs. (V.K.,J.) (K.R.,J.) 04.08.2020 kpl/tar To M/s.Olympus Elevator Private Ltd., by L/R. M/s.Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd., NO.50-55, Vanagaram Road, Ayanambakkam, Chennai 600 095. http://www.judis.nic.in Order dt.04.08.2020 in T.C.A.No.335 of 2017 4/4 DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J. and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. (tar) T.C.A.No.335 of 2017 04.08.2020 http://www.judis.nic.in Principal Commissioner of Income-tax 4, Chennai v. Olympus Elevator Private Ltd
Report Error