The Income-tax Officer, Corporate Ward 5(4), Chennai v. Rapid Care Transcription P. Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0721-9]

Citation 2020-LL-0721-9
Appellant Name The Income-tax Officer, Corporate Ward 5(4), Chennai
Respondent Name Rapid Care Transcription P. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 21/07/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: 598 of 2018 and C.M.P.No. In W.A. No 598 of 2018 JUDGMENT This writ appeal is filed against the order dated 22.12.2017 in W.P.No. 33765 of 2017, whereby the respondent/writ petitioner was given four weeks time from the date of receipt of a copy of the order to file an appeal before the ITAT. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the appeal before the Tribunal itself has been disposed of. 3.In view of the aforesaid factual statement, nothing survives for consideration in this writ appeal and the same stands dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.


W.A. No 598 of 2018 IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.07.2020 CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA W.A.No. 598 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.5817 of 2018 Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 5(4), Floor No.403, Aayakar Bhavan, Main Building, No.121, M.G. Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 34. .. Appellant Vs M/s.Rapid Care Transcription P. Ltd., Old No.21, New No.41, VLV Complex, Mount Road, Little Mount, Saidapet, Chennai - 15. .. Respondent Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against order dated 22.12.2017 in W.P.No.33765 of 2017. For Petitioner .. Ms.Hema Muralikrishnan For Respondents .. Mr.M.D.Mudimannan Page 1 of 3 http://www.judis.nic.in W.A. No 598 of 2018 JUDGMENT (Judgment of Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) This writ appeal is filed against order dated 22.12.2017 in W.P.No.33765 of 2017, whereby respondent/writ petitioner was given four weeks time from date of receipt of copy of order to file appeal before ITAT. 2.When matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for parties submitted that appeal before Tribunal itself has been disposed of. 3.In view of aforesaid factual statement, nothing survives for consideration in this writ appeal and same stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (M.M.S., J.) (R.H., J.) 21.07.2020 Index: Yes/No mmi/ssm Page 2 of 3 http://www.judis.nic.in W.A. No 598 of 2018 M.M.SUNDRESH, J. and R.HEMALATHA,J. mmi/ssm W.A.No.598 of 2018 21.07.2020 Page 3 of 3 http://www.judis.nic.in Income-tax Officer, Corporate Ward 5(4), Chennai v. Rapid Care Transcription P. Ltd
Report Error