Muthukulam Block Agricultural Improvement Co-Operative Society v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kottayam / Income-tax Officer Ward 4, Alappuzha
[Citation -2020-LL-0714]

Citation 2020-LL-0714
Appellant Name Muthukulam Block Agricultural Improvement Co-Operative Society
Respondent Name Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kottayam / Income-tax Officer Ward 4, Alappuzha
Court HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 14/07/2020
Assessment Year 2017-18
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags application for stay • stay of recovery • demand notice • stay petition
Bot Summary: No.8661 of 2020 2 JUDGMENT Against Ext.P1 assessment order under the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition before the 1st respondent. It is a case of the petitioner that even before the 1st respondent has had an occasion to consider the appeal preferred by the petitioner, recovery steps are afoot to recover the amounts confirmed against the petitioner by Ext.P1 assessment order. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Standing counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the Bar, and finding the main issue agitated in the appeal is the permissibility of the deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act in its relation to Co-operative societies, and finding that in similar matters this Court has granted a stay of recovery pending disposal of the appeal by the by the First Appellate Authority, the Writ Petition is disposed by directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 appeal within an outer time limit of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. It is made clear that till such time as orders are passed by the 1st respondent as directed, and the order communicated to the petitioner, recovery steps for recovery of amounts W.P.(C). No.8661 of 2020 3 confirmed against the petitioner by Ext.P1 assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment, before the 1st respondent, for further action.


IN HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, 14TH DAY OF JULY 2020 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1942 WP(C).No.8661 OF 2020(G) PETITIONER: MUTHUKULAM BLOCK AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, MUTHUKULAM BLOCK, KAREELAKULANGARA, KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA-690 572. BY ADVS. SRI.V.G.ARUN (K/795/2004) SMT.V.JAYA RAGI SRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN (KAMBISSERIL) SRI.NEERAJ NARAYAN SHRI.SARATH SUKUMARAN RESPONDENTS: 1 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) BAKER HILLS KOTTAYAM-686 002. 2 INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4, T.K. ROAD, THIRUVALLA, ALAPPUZHA-689 101. BY ADV.SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.07.2020, COURT ON SAME DAY DELIVERED FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No.8661 of 2020 2 JUDGMENT Against Ext.P1 assessment order under Income Tax Act, petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition before 1st respondent. It is case of petitioner that even before 1st respondent has had occasion to consider appeal preferred by petitioner, recovery steps are afoot to recover amounts confirmed against petitioner by Ext.P1 assessment order. 2. I have heard learned counsel appearing for petitioner and also learned Standing counsel appearing for Income Tax Department. On consideration of facts and circumstances of case as also submissions made across Bar, and finding main issue agitated in appeal is permissibility of deduction under Section 80P of Income Tax Act in its relation to Co-operative societies, and finding that in similar matters this Court has granted stay of recovery pending disposal of appeal by by First Appellate Authority, Writ Petition is disposed by directing 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 appeal within outer time limit of six months from date of receipt of copy of this judgment, after hearing petitioner. It is made clear that till such time as orders are passed by 1st respondent as directed, and order communicated to petitioner, recovery steps for recovery of amounts W.P.(C).No.8661 of 2020 3 confirmed against petitioner by Ext.P1 assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. petitioner shall produce copy of writ petition together with copy of this judgment, before 1st respondent, for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns/14.7.2020 W.P.(C).No.8661 of 2020 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29.12.2019 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 156 OF INCOME TAX ACT DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUED FOR YEAR 2017-18 BY 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF APPEAL DATED 23.1.2020 FILED FOR YEAR 2017-18 BEFORE IST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF APPLICATION FOR STAY DATED 10.2.2020 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE IST RESPONDENT. Muthukulam Block Agricultural Improvement Co-Operative Society v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kottayam / Income-tax Officer Ward 4, Alappuzha
Report Error