Sunil Kumar Singh v. Union Of India, Through Principal Secretary Finance / State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary
[Citation -2020-LL-0703-7]

Citation 2020-LL-0703-7
Appellant Name Sunil Kumar Singh
Respondent Name Union Of India, Through Principal Secretary Finance / State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary
Court HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 03/07/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags interest on interest • sale consideration • limitation period • capital gain tax • public interest
Bot Summary: This writ application in the form of a Public Interest Litigation has been filed by the petitioner, who is a Member from legal profession seeking a direction to the authorities to amend the guidelines issued for deferment of loan installments and make specific provisions that the financial institutions will not charge interest on interest during the Pandemic. He further sought direction to carry out amendment in Section 54 of the Income Tax CW-6056/2020 Act. Mr. R.D. Rastogi, learned Additional Solicitor General on behalf of Union of India submits that some directions have been issued in the writ application pending before the Hon ble Apex Court and Union of India has taken its stand before the Hon ble Supreme Court. He further contends that this writ application is in the nature of public interest litigation and also involves a matter of policy, which is beyond the scope of jurisdiction of this Court. On perusing the grounds taken in the writ application, we find that although it is asserted that the persons who have sold their houses two years back had to invest the sale consideration thereof, which was to be utilised by them by 30 th June, failing which, they would be required to pay Capital Gain Tax thereon but this ground does not arise for consideration since the details of the persons have not been brought to our notice. Further, this is a matter of policy which is under consideration by the Union of India and also under live consideration of the Apex Court. Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in the interest of individuals who may be affected.


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6056/2020 Sunil Kumar Singh S/o Dr. S.P. Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/169/1991 R/o A-578, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer-305004 Also At- 141-B, Ganpati Plaza, M.I. Road, Jaipur-302001 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Principal Secretary Finance, Jeevan Deep Building, Parliament Street, New Delhi - 110001 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 302005 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh in person through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.D. Rastogi, ASG with Mr. V.P. Mathur through VC HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA Order 03/07/2020 1. Heard learned counsel for parties. 2. This writ application in form of Public Interest Litigation has been filed by petitioner, who is Member from legal profession seeking direction to authorities to amend guidelines issued for deferment of loan installments and make specific provisions that financial institutions will not charge interest on interest during Pandemic. He further sought direction to carry out amendment in Section 54 of Income Tax (Downloaded on 07/07/2020 at 09:41:44 AM) (2 of 2) [CW-6056/2020] Act. He further sought direction that limitation period of investment in new assets may be raised from two to three years. 3. Mr. R.D. Rastogi, learned Additional Solicitor General on behalf of Union of India submits that some directions have been issued in writ application pending before Hon ble Apex Court and Union of India has taken its stand before Hon ble Supreme Court. He further contends that this writ application is in nature of public interest litigation and also involves matter of policy, which is beyond scope of jurisdiction of this Court. 4. On perusing grounds taken in writ application, we find that although it is asserted that persons who have sold their houses two years back had to invest sale consideration thereof, which was to be utilised by them by 30 th June, failing which, they would be required to pay Capital Gain Tax thereon but this ground does not arise for consideration since details of persons have not been brought to our notice. Further, this is matter of policy which is under consideration by Union of India and also under live consideration of Apex Court. 5. For these reasons, we do not see any reason to interfere in present matter at this juncture. 6. Accordingly, writ application is dismissed with liberty to petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in interest of individuals who may be affected. (PRAKASH GUPTA),J (INDRAJIT MAHANTY),CJ ANIL KUMAR GOYAL /JKP/24 (Downloaded on 07/07/2020 at 09:41:44 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Sunil Kumar Singh v. Union Of India, Through Principal Secretary Finance / State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary
Report Error