Prem Chand Jain v. The Income-tax Officer, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur
[Citation -2020-LL-0701]

Citation 2020-LL-0701
Appellant Name Prem Chand Jain
Respondent Name The Income-tax Officer, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur
Court HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 01/07/2020
Assessment Year 2014-15
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags books of accounts • gross profit
Bot Summary: Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the grounds taken herein and also perused the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Authority. Learned counsel for the appellant fairly admits that the appellant did not produce any books of accounts since he has lost the same before the income tax authorities. On perusal of the same, it appears that the appellant had a sale turnover in the assessment year 2014-15 for a sum of 26.9 Crores and he indicated the gross profit of 24.9 Lacs on total sales, which effectively amounted to only 0.93. The appellant submitted that his books of accounts were lost in transaction for which he has lodged the FIR. 4. After perusing the order of the ITAT, we do not find any justifiable cause to interfere with the same.


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.41/2019 Shri Prem Chand Jain, 8/314, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sandeep Taneja through VC For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA Order 01/07/2020 1. Heard learned counsel for appellant and perused grounds taken herein and also perused order passed by Income Tax Appellate Authority (ITAT). 2. Learned counsel for appellant fairly admits that appellant did not produce any books of accounts since he has lost same before income tax authorities. 3. On perusal of same, it appears that appellant had sale turnover in assessment year 2014-15 for sum of 26.9 Crores and he indicated gross profit of 24.9 Lacs on total sales, which effectively amounted to only 0.93%. appellant submitted that his books of accounts were lost in transaction for which he has lodged FIR. 4. After perusing order of ITAT, we do not find any justifiable cause to interfere with same. (Downloaded on 03/07/2020 at 10:54:22 AM) (2 of 2) [ITA-41/2019] 5. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed. (PRAKASH GUPTA),J (INDRAJIT MAHANTY),CJ Anil Goyal-PS/PKM/8 (Downloaded on 03/07/2020 at 10:54:22 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Prem Chand Jain v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur
Report Error