Bright-Vijaywargi (JV) v. Union of India and others
[Citation -2020-LL-0605-42]

Citation 2020-LL-0605-42
Appellant Name Bright-Vijaywargi (JV)
Respondent Name Union of India and others
Relevant Act CGST
Date of Order 05/06/2020
Judgment View Judgment

109 IN HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.7802 of 2020 Date of Decision: June 05, 2020 M/s Bright-Vijaywargi (JV) ...Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present: Mr.Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.Sourabh Goel, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.Ankur Mittal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.3 and 4. **** JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. matter has been taken up through video-conferencing in light of pandemic Covid-19 situation and as per instructions. This writ petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of writ, in nature of mandamus for directing respondents to issue password to petitioner against provisional ID for TIN 06461950758 allotted to it so that it can migrate itself from VAT to GST regime and also to issue GST Registration Certificate which has not been done till date despite fact of having sent various E-mails and letters to various authorities etc. 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 30-04-2021 11:01:55 ::: CWP No.7802 of 2020 -2- Learned counsel for petitioner states that at this stage he would be satisfied, if direction is issued to respondent No.2-Goods and Service Tax Network, to consider and decide E-mail (Annexure P-13) expeditiously. Heard. Notice of motion. Mr.Sourabh Goel, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 and and Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.3 and 4. In view of above, without adverting to merits of case, present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2- Goods and Service Tax Network to consider and decide E-mail (Annexure P-13) in accordance with law within six weeks from receipt of certified copy of judgment. In case, on consideration, competent authority reaches to conclusion that relief sought by petitioner is admissible to it, in such eventuality, consequential relief be allowed to it. However, in case, any deficiency is noticed in documents, before rejecting case of petitioner, it be afforded opportunity of hearing. Disposed of accordingly. (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) (ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE JUDGE June 05, 2020 Vgulati Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 30-04-2021 11:01:56 ::: Bright-Vijaywargi (JV) v. Union of India and other
Report Error