Grand Jewellers v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, The Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-1, Ernakulam / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Ernakulam
[Citation -2020-LL-0525]
Citation | 2020-LL-0525 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Grand Jewellers |
Respondent Name | The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, The Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-1, Ernakulam / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Ernakulam |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 25/05/2020 |
Assessment Year | 2017-18 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | stay petition |
Bot Summary: | No.10214/20 2 JUDGMENT Petitioner, a partnership firm preferred an appeal against the assessment order Ext.P1, accompanied by a stay application Ext.P3. The grievance of the petitioner is that, during the pendency of the appeal, notice of demand under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act was issued by the 1 st respondent. The predicament of the petitioner is writ large as there is no adjudication on the stay application. Sri.Christopher Abraham, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department submits that there would not be an aversion to the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal, in case an appropriate direction is issued for the adjudication of the stay application. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and appraised the paper book and without commenting on the merits of the matter, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to W.P.(C). No.10214/20 3 the 2nd respondent to take a call on the application Ext.P3 preferred against the assessment order as expeditiously as possible, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law. It is made clear that the interim direction shall be operative only till the adjudication of the stay application. With the aforementioned direction, this writ petition is disposed of. |