The Akathethara Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. The Income-tax Officer Ward-2,Palakkad/The Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals),Thrissur/The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal,Kakkanadu/The Kerala State Co-Oeprative Bank,Erstwhile Palakkad Dis Co-op Bank
[Citation -2020-LL-0317-47]

Citation 2020-LL-0317-47
Appellant Name The Akathethara Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
Respondent Name The Income-tax Officer Ward-2,Palakkad/The Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals),Thrissur/The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal,Kakkanadu/The Kerala State Co-Oeprative Bank,Erstwhile Palakkad Dis Co-op Bank
Court HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 17/03/2020
Assessment Year 2016-17
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags stay petition • interim stay
Bot Summary: No.8150 OF 2020(P) 2 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court seeking directions to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to consider Ext.P4 stay petition preferred along with the appeal, Ext.P3 against the orders of the assessment Ext.P1 and the first appellate court ie. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the appeal and stay application have been filed on 9th March 2020. Post thereto received a garnishee notice Ext.P5. In these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court. The learned Government Pleader submits that the Tribunal would not have any difficulty in taking up the interim application but the appeals are being taken up on seniority basis. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and appraised the paper book. No.8150 OF 2020(P) 3 matter, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P4 interim application preferred along with the appeal in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. It is made clear that the interim stay is till the disposal of the interim application and not beyond.


IN HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.8150 OF 2020(P) PETITIONER/S: AKATHETHARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, F-1514, AKATHETHARA POST, PALAKKAD 678 008, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SUBHA PRABHAKARA VARMA P, AGED 53, D/O. V.K PRABHAKARA VARMA BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1 INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2, PALAKKAD 678 001 2 COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR 680 001 3 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AYAKAR BHAVAN, KAKKANADU, KOCHI 682 030, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 4 KERALA STATE CO-OEPRATIVE BANK, ERSTWHILE PALAKKAD DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, TOWN BUS STAND ROAD, PALAKKAD 678 014, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN OTHER PRESENT: SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC SRI M SASINDRAN SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.03.2020, COURT ON SAME DAY DELIVERED FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.8150 OF 2020(P) 2 JUDGMENT petitioner has approached this Court seeking directions to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to consider Ext.P4 stay petition preferred along with appeal, Ext.P3 against orders of assessment Ext.P1 and first appellate court ie., Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Ext.P2. 2. learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that appeal and stay application have been filed on 9th March 2020. However, post thereto received garnishee notice Ext.P5. In these circumstances, petitioner has approached this Court. 3. learned Government Pleader submits that Tribunal would not have any difficulty in taking up interim application but appeals are being taken up on seniority basis. 4. I have heard learned counsel for parties and appraised paper book. Without expressing any opinion on merits of WP(C).No.8150 OF 2020(P) 3 matter, I dispose of writ petition with direction to 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P4 interim application preferred along with appeal in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner within period of 30 days from date of receipt of copy of order. Till such time, operation of garnishee notice, Ext.P5 is ordered to be kept in abeyance. It is made clear that interim stay is till disposal of interim application and not beyond. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL sab JUDGE WP(C).No.8150 OF 2020(P) 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT FOR YEAR 2016-17 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT 1ST RESPONDENT FOR YEAR 2016-17 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT 2016-17 EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. Akathethara Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer Ward-2,Palakkad/The Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals),Thrissur/The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal,Kakkanadu/The Kerala State Co-Oeprative Bank,Erstwhile Palakkad Dis Co-op Bank
Report Error