Rupam Rajendra Gorecha v. Income-Tax Officer
[Citation -2020-LL-0316-13]

Citation 2020-LL-0316-13
Appellant Name Rupam Rajendra Gorecha
Respondent Name Income-Tax Officer
Court HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 16/03/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags refund
Bot Summary: On 24th February, 2020 this Court passed the following order: Mr. Patel, the learned standing counsel appearing for the Revenue makes a statement that the CIT, Vadodara has concluded the hearing of the appeal preferred by the writ applicant. Today, when the matter is taken up for further hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the parties brings to our notice that the CIT(A), Vadodara has allowed the appeal preferred by the writ applicant. Nothing further is required to be Page 1 of 2 Downloaded on : Wed Mar 18 11:34:31 IST 2020 C/SCA/650/2020 ORDER adjudicated so far as the present writ application is concerned. As the writ applicant has succeeded before the CIT(A), the law with regard to the claim of refund will take its own course.


IN HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 650 of 2020 RUPAM RAJENDRA GORECHA Versus INCOME-TAX OFFICER Appearance: MR D K TRIVEDI(5283) for Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR DEVARSHI C SHAH(5545) for Petitioner(s) No. 1 DELETED(20) for Respondent(s) No. 3 MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802) for Respondent(s) No. 1,2 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Date : 16/03/2020 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) 1. On 24th February, 2020 this Court passed following order: Mr. Patel, learned standing counsel appearing for Revenue makes statement that CIT (A), Vadodara has concluded hearing of appeal preferred by writ applicant. order is awaited. Post matter on 16th March, 2020. 2. Today, when matter is taken up for further hearing, learned counsel appearing for parties brings to our notice that CIT(A), Vadodara has allowed appeal preferred by writ applicant. 3. In such circumstances, nothing further is required to be Page 1 of 2 Downloaded on : Wed Mar 18 11:34:31 IST 2020 C/SCA/650/2020 ORDER adjudicated so far as present writ application is concerned. As writ applicant has succeeded before CIT(A), law with regard to claim of refund will take its own course. This application is disposed of in above terms. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) aruna Page 2 of 2 Downloaded on : Wed Mar 18 11:34:31 IST 2020 Rupam Rajendra Gorecha v. Income-Tax Officer
Report Error