The Edathiruthy Kissan Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Thrissur/The Income-tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Thrissur, Office of The Income-tax Officer, Thrissur
[Citation -2020-LL-0313-85]
Citation | 2020-LL-0313-85 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | The Edathiruthy Kissan Co-Operative Bank Ltd. |
Respondent Name | The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Thrissur/The Income-tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Thrissur, Office of The Income-tax Officer, Thrissur |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 13/03/2020 |
Assessment Year | 2017-18 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | stay petition • demand notice • tax due |
Bot Summary: | The petitioner preferred Ext.P3 appeal along with Ext.P5 stay petition. In the meanwhile Ext.P4 was issued demanding remittance of 20 of the tax due, which is disputed in the appeal. The prayer in the writ petition is for expeditious consideration of either the appeal or the stay petition and to stay the recovery proceedings including the insistence to pay 20 of the amount as demanded under Ext.P4. 2. After taking note of the peculiar aspects involved and the decision W.P.(C) No.7928 of 2020 3 of the Full Bench in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut 2019 KHC 287, the Division Bench held the insistence for payment of proportion of the demand as a condition for grant of stay to be bad. 3. In the light of the Division Bench judgment, the demand for remittance of 20 of the tax assessed pending consideration of the appeals, cannot be sustained. The writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P3 appeal filed by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. Till the appeal is decided on merits, further proceedings for recovery pursuant to Ext.P1 to be kept in abeyance. |