Choondacherry Service Co Operative Bank Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals),Kottayam/The Income-tax Officer, Office of the Income-tax Officer, Ward No.1, Kottayam
[Citation -2020-LL-0313-73]
Citation | 2020-LL-0313-73 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Choondacherry Service Co Operative Bank Ltd. |
Respondent Name | The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals),Kottayam/The Income-tax Officer, Office of the Income-tax Officer, Ward No.1, Kottayam |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 13/03/2020 |
Assessment Year | 2017-18 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | stay petition • demand notice • recovery proceeding |
Bot Summary: | No. 7746 of 2020 Dated this the 13th day of March, 2020 JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Exhibit P1 assessment order for the year 2017- 2018 the petitioner has preferred Exhibit P3 appeal before the 1 st respondent. Along with the appeal, the petitioner has filed Exhibit P4 stay petition seeking stay of the recovery proceedings based on Exhibit P1 order. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for expeditious consideration of either Exhibit P3 appeal or Exhibit P4 stay petition and to keep the recovery proceedings in abeyance till such time. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department also. Considering the limited relief sought, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition directing the 1 st respondent to consider Exhibit P3 appeal and pass orders on merits as expeditiously as possible. Till orders are passed on Exhibit P3, recovery proceedings based on Exhibit P1 assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. |