Pampakuda Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO, Ward-2, Thodupuzha / CIT (A)-2, Kochi
[Citation -2020-LL-0309-31]

Citation 2020-LL-0309-31
Appellant Name Pampakuda Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
Respondent Name ITO, Ward-2, Thodupuzha / CIT (A)-2, Kochi
Court HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 09/03/2020
Assessment Year 2017-18
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags recovery proceeding
Bot Summary: No.7032 OF 2020(D) 2 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the second respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax against the assessment order Ext.P1. 2. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on payment of 20 of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.


IN HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL MONDAY, 09TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 19TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.7032 OF 2020(D) PETITIONER/S: PAMPAKUDA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3520 PAMBAKUDA P.O. MOOVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 686 667, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS. SRI.C.A.JOJO SRI.MATHEWS JOSEPH RESPONDENT/S: 1 INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, INCOME TAX OFFICE, TEMPLE ROAD, THODUPUZHA 685 584. 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2, OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL REVENUE TOWER , KOCHI 682 018. OTHER PRESENT: SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.03.2020, COURT ON SAME DAY DELIVERED FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.7032 OF 2020(D) 2 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking direction to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before second respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against assessment order Ext.P1. 2. Having heard learned counsel on both sides, writ petition is disposed of with direction to second respondent to take decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner, within period of three months from date of receipt of copy of this judgment without insisting on payment of 20% of tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time decision is taken on appeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL sab JUDGE WP(C).No.7032 OF 2020(D) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER AY 2017-18 DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUED BY FIRST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 19.12.2019 ISSUED BY FIRST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL FOR AY 2017- 18 BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 17.01.2020. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DEMAND REMITTING FOR 20% OF TAX DATED 04.03.2020 FOR AY 2017-18 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DEMAND REMITTING FOR 20% OF TAX DATED 04.03.2020 FOR AY 2017-18 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. Pampakuda Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO, Ward-2, Thodupuzha / CIT (A)-2, Kochi
Report Error