7 IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 995/2019 & CM APPL. 53613/2019 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Shlok Chandra and Ms. Madhura M. N., Advocates. versus MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. Respondent Through: Ms. Kavita Jha and Ms. Devika Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER 02.03.2020 1. This Court notices that question of law urged, i.e. Tribunal s power to extend period of stay beyond 365 days period has been explained and read down by this Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT 376 ITR 87. In these circumstances, question of law urged does not arise. At same time, Tribunal is directed to expedite hearing and deliver its final verdict with utmost despatch. 2. appeal and pending application are dismissed. VIPIN SANGHI, J SANJEEV NARULA, J MARCH 02, 2020 v Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By: SAPNA SETHI Signing Date: 06.03.2020 12:06:34 Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-6 v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd