The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gurgaon v. Zaroopa Foods Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0224-30]

Citation 2020-LL-0224-30
Appellant Name The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gurgaon
Respondent Name Zaroopa Foods Pvt. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 24/02/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags monetary limit • tax effect
Bot Summary: Learned counsel for the appellant states that since the tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018 dated 22.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with Letter No. F.No. M-93/2018-ITJ dated 22.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. He prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein. Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, the pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. JUDGE 24.02.2020 JUDGE reema Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes REEMA SAINI 2020.02.25 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and Whether Reportable: No integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh.


IN HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 339 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.02.2020. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon Appellant Versus Zaroopa Foods Pvt. Ltd. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate Senior Standing counsel for appellant. AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for appellant states that since tax effect involved is less than monetary limit as prescribed in Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018 dated 22.08.2019 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with Letter No. F.No.279/Misc./M-93/2018-ITJ dated 22.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw present appeal. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to appellant-revenue to file application for revival of appeal, in case something survives therein. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3. Since main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE (AVNEESH JHINGAN) 24.02.2020 JUDGE reema Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes REEMA SAINI 2020.02.25 15:37 I attest to accuracy and Whether Reportable: No integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gurgaon v. Zaroopa Foods Pvt. Ltd
Report Error