Payportal Services Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-19(2)
[Citation -2020-LL-0219-116]

Citation 2020-LL-0219-116
Appellant Name Payportal Services Private Limited
Respondent Name Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-19(2)
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 19/02/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags demand notice • application for stay • attachment of bank account
Bot Summary: The short grievance in the present writ petition is against the demand notice issued in pursuance of the assessment order passed the Assessing Officer, for Rs.3,60,87,171/-. The petitioner has preferred a stay application, before the AO as well as CIT before whom the statutory appeal has been preferred. The grievance is that neither of the stay applications has been considered and the respondent has proceeded to attach the bank account of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent states that the AO shall dispose of the stay application, moved by the petitioner, within one week from today and till then the amount in the account of the petitioner shall not be appropriated. In view of the aforesaid statement, which shall continue to bind the respondent, this petition is accordingly disposed of.


47 IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1895/2020 M/S. PAYPORTAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner Through: Mr.Saubhagya Agarwal and Mr.Abhishek Mohan, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 19(2) Respondent Through: Mr.Deepak Anand, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr.Vipul Agarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER 19.02.2020 1. Issue notice. Learned counsel for respondent accepts notice. 2. short grievance in present writ petition is against demand notice issued in pursuance of assessment order passed Assessing Officer (AO), for Rs.3,60,87,171/-. 3. petitioner has preferred stay application, before AO as well as CIT (A) before whom statutory appeal has been preferred. grievance is that neither of stay applications has been considered and respondent has proceeded to attach bank account of petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for respondent states that AO shall dispose of stay application, moved by petitioner, within one week from today and till then amount in account of petitioner shall not be appropriated. 5. In view of aforesaid statement, which shall continue to bind respondent, this petition is accordingly disposed of. 6. Dasti. VIPIN SANGHI, J SANJEEV NARULA, J FEBRUARY 19, 2020 v Payportal Services Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-19(2)
Report Error