Akay Flavours And Aromatics (P) Ltd. v. The DCIT, Corporate Cir.-1(1), Kochi / The CIT (Appeals), Kochi
[Citation -2020-LL-0218-6]

Citation 2020-LL-0218-6
Appellant Name Akay Flavours And Aromatics (P) Ltd.
Respondent Name The DCIT, Corporate Cir.-1(1), Kochi / The CIT (Appeals), Kochi
Court HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 18/02/2020
Assessment Year 2017-18
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags application for stay • demand notice • stay petition • outstanding demand
Bot Summary: No.4533 OF 2020(N) 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 18th day of February 2020 Petitioner, in the instant case, has sought for indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. He is aggrieved by non-consideration of appeal and interim application preferred against the order of assessment dated 20.12.2019 pertaining to the assessment year 2017 -18. During the interregnum, Ext.P5 demand notice dated 12.02.2020 was issued calling upon the petitioner to pay 20 of the demand outstanding for the purpose of stay. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the demand as raised in the demand notice is based upon a Circular of March, 2017, which is held to be invalid by a decision of the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Mavilayi Service Co- operative Bank Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut 2019 KHC 287. Jose Joseph, learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department, submits that he has no dispute regarding the observations in the above-said judgment but added that the observations of the Court only pertains to the cases where assessment orders are passed in respect of Co-operative Societies, claiming exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides and perusing the materials on record, without expressing any opinion on merit, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the second respondent to consider the prayer for consideration of Ext.P4 interim stay along with appeal, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Ext.P5 is ordered to be kept in abeyance and the interim arrangement shall be construed till the adjudication of the interim application by the appellate authority.


IN HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 29TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.4533 OF 2020(N) PETITIONER/S: M/S. AKAY FLAVOURS AND AROMATICS(P)LTD., AMBUNAD, MALAIDAMTHURUTHU P.O., KIZHAKKAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM - 683 561, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER MR. KJ. THANKACHAN BY ADVS. SRI. JOSEPH MARKOSE (SR.) SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS SRI. ISAAC THOMAS SRI. P. G. CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM SHRI. VIPIN ANTO H. M. SHRI. ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS SHRI.SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA RESPONDENT/S: 1 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DCIT CORPORATE CIR 1 (1), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) G-51, PARAPPILLY LANE, MANORAMA JUNCTION, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI - 682 036 OTHER PRESENT: SRI JOSE JOSEPH,SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.02.2020, COURT ON SAME DAY DELIVERED FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.4533 OF 2020(N) 2 JUDGMENT Dated this 18th day of February 2020 Petitioner, in instant case, has sought for indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India. He is aggrieved by non-consideration of appeal and interim application preferred against order of assessment dated 20.12.2019 pertaining to assessment year 2017 -18. During interregnum, Ext.P5 demand notice dated 12.02.2020 was issued calling upon petitioner to pay 20% of demand outstanding for purpose of stay. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that demand as raised in demand notice is based upon Circular of March, 2017, which is held to be invalid by decision of Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Mavilayi Service Co- operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut [2019 (2) KHC 287]. He added that, as of today, even appeal and application for stay have not been numbered so far. WP(C).No.4533 OF 2020(N) 3 3. Sri. Jose Joseph, learned Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, submits that he has no dispute regarding observations in above-said judgment but added that observations of Court only pertains to cases where assessment orders are passed in respect of Co-operative Societies, claiming exemption under Section 80P of Income Tax Act. Having heard learned counsel on both sides and perusing materials on record, without expressing any opinion on merit, I dispose of this writ petition with direction to second respondent to consider prayer for consideration of Ext.P4 interim stay along with appeal, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Till such time, Ext.P5 is ordered to be kept in abeyance and interim arrangement shall be construed till adjudication of interim application by appellate authority. SD/- AMIT RAWAL shg JUDGE WP(C).No.4533 OF 2020(N) 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 20/12/2019 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT CALCULATION OF DISALLOWANCES AND TAX EFFECTED ON PETITIONER DTD NIL EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL DATED 20/01/2020 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 28/01/2020 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED 12/02/2020 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT Akay Flavours And Aromatics (P) Ltd. v. DCIT, Corporate Cir.-1(1), Kochi / CIT (Appeals), Kochi
Report Error