Sakay Traders v. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar And Another
[Citation -2020-LL-0218-15]

Citation 2020-LL-0218-15
Appellant Name Sakay Traders
Respondent Name The Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar And Another
Court HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 18/02/2020
Assessment Year 1992-93
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags low tax effect
Bot Summary: AJAY TEWARI, J. 1 This appeal has been under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 16.09.1999 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar in ITA No.689(ASR)/1993 for the assessment year 1992-93. 2 It transpires that this appeal is a cross-appeal to the appeal filed by the Revenue. The appeal filed by the Revenue was withdrawn on account of low tax effect. 3 In the circumstances, the appeal is rendered infructuous. 5 Since the appeal is disposed of, the pending application, if any, stands disposed of. Whether reportable : Yes / No PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.02.20 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH.


443 IN HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No.18 of 2002 Date of Decision: 18.02.2020 M/s Sakay Traders, Jalandhar through its Partner Sh. Ashok Katyal Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar and another Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Vivek Sethi, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Varun Issar, Jr. Panel Counsel for respondents. AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) [1] This appeal has been under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against order dated 16.09.1999 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar in ITA No.689(ASR)/1993 for assessment year 1992-93. [2] It transpires that this appeal is cross-appeal to appeal filed by Revenue. appeal filed by Revenue was withdrawn on account of low tax effect. [3] In circumstances, appeal is rendered infructuous. [4] Disposed of accordingly. [5] Since appeal is disposed of, pending application, if any, stands disposed of. [AJAY TEWARI] JUDGE [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE February 18, 2020 pankaj baweja 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.02.20 10:30 I attest to accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH Sakay Traders v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar And Another
Report Error