The Commissioner of Income-tax-I, Coimbatore v. Engi Ultra Industries Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0214-78]

Citation 2020-LL-0214-78
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax-I, Coimbatore
Respondent Name Engi Ultra Industries Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 14/02/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags monetary limit • sister concern • amalgamation • tax effect • merger • bad debt
Bot Summary: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in observing that the so written-off amount, if not, allowable as deduction under section 36 is to be allowed under section 37 of the Act, especially when there is a special provision for deduction of debts 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in holding that the bad debts are covered by Section 37 of the Act by relying only on the self serving accounting by the assessee, when the same is not laid out and expended wholly for the business of the assessee 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be Page 2 of 4 Order in TCA No.670 of 2011 dated 14.02.2020 filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/-. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeals filed by the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in an appropriate case. 14.02.2020 arr Note to Office: Copy of this order may be sent to both parties.


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.02.2020 CORAM HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Tax Case (Appeal) No.670 of 2011 Commissioner of Income-Tax-I, Coimbatore. ... Appellant Vs. M/s.Engi Ultra Industries Ltd., India House, 1239, Tiruchy Road, Coimbatore-18 PAN AAACE4566G Respondent Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against common order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'C' Bench, Chennai dated 15.06.2011 in ITA No.463/Mds/2011. For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar , Ms.K.G.Usha Rani For Respondent : Mr.N.V.Balaji JUDGMENT (Judgment of Court was delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J) This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by Revenue calling in question correctness of order passed by Income Tax Page 1 of 4 Order in TCA No.670 of 2011 (C.I.T. -Vs- M/s.Elgi Ultra Industries Ltd.,) dated 14.02.2020 Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai, by raising following substantial questions of law: "1.Whether on facts and in circumstances of case, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law in holding that assessee is justified in taking over of debts of its sister concern, though there was no merger or amalgamation, which is obviously self-serving arrangement and colorable device? 2. Whether, on facts and in circumstances of case, Tribunal is correct in observing that so written-off amount, if not, allowable as deduction under section 36 (1) (vii) is to be allowed under section 37 (1) of Act, especially when there is special provision for deduction of debts? 3. Whether, on facts and in circumstances of case, Income tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in holding that bad debts are covered by Section 37 (1) of Act by relying only on self serving accounting by assessee, when same is not laid out and expended wholly for business of assessee? 2. When matter was taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel brought to our notice Circular instruction issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be Page 2 of 4 Order in TCA No.670 of 2011 (C.I.T. -Vs- M/s.Elgi Ultra Industries Ltd.,) dated 14.02.2020 filed/pursued by Department before High Court in cases where tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). 3. In instant case, tax effect is said to be less than monetary limit imposed and therefore, appeals filed by Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open substantial questions of law for determination in appropriate case. (V.K.,J.) (R.S.K.,J.) 14.02.2020 arr Note to Office: Copy of this order may be sent to both parties. Page 3 of 4 Order in TCA No.670 of 2011 (C.I.T. -Vs- M/s.Elgi Ultra Industries Ltd.,) dated 14.02.2020 DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J. AND R.SURESH KUMAR, J. arr To Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'C' Bench,Chennai. T.C.(A) No.670 of 2011 14.02.2020 Page 4 of 4 Commissioner of Income-tax-I, Coimbatore v. Engi Ultra Industries Ltd
Report Error