ITA No. 9 of 2013 -1- 1034 IN HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 9 of 2013 Date of Decision: 10.02.2020 VMT Spinning Co. Ltd., Ludhiana Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana and another Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.S. Kanda, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Jr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) [1] This is appeal filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against order dated 13.07.2012 passed in ITA No.682/Chd/2007 for assessment year 2003-04. [2] At very outset, learned senior advocate states that questions No.(ii) and (iii) would have to be substituted with question No.(vi) of ITA No.216 of 2013 titled as Vardhman Holdings Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 1, Ludhiana and another and same be disposed of in same terms. [3] Learned counsel for Revenue could not dispute same. PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.02.13 08:42 I attest to accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh ITA No. 9 of 2013 -2- [4] Learned counsel for parties are ad idem that question No.(i) and substituted question instead of (ii) and (iii) (claimed) have been answered in ITA No.216 of 2013. [5] In circumstances, appeal stands disposed of in same terms as in ITA No.216 of 2013. [6] Since appeal is disposed of, pending application, if any, stands disposed of. [AJAY TEWARI] JUDGE [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE February 10, 2020 pankaj baweja 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PANKAJ BAWEJA 2020.02.13 08:42 I attest to accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh VMT Spinning Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Ludhiana And Another