25. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1449/2020 M/S ESSJAY ERICSSON PRIVATE LIMITED, Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Aggarwal, Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Ms. Hemlata Rawat and Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI & ORS. Respondent Through: Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Mr. Talha AR, Mr.Dinesh Sharma and Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER 07.02.2020 C.M. No. 5013/2020 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1449/2020 and C.M. No. 5012/2020 Issue notice. Learned counsel for respondents accepts notice. We have heard learned counsels and proceed to dispose of petition at this stage itself. No counter-affidavit is called for in view of order that we propose to pass. grievance of petitioner is with regard to rejection of petitioner s application under Section 220(6) by Assessing Officer vide order dated 23.01.2020 and consequent attachment of bank accounts of petitioner. We are informed that petitioner s appeal is already pending before CIT (Appeals). We permit petitioner to immediately file stay application before CIT (Appeals). CIT (Appeals) shall consider same and pass order thereon within two weeks without being influenced by order dated 23.01.2020 passed by Assessing Officer on stay application under Section 220(6). bank accounts of petitioner already stand attached and amounts recovered. In case, CIT (Appeals) grants relief after hearing assessee, to extent that any amount may have been recovered in excess of amount in respect of which stay is not granted, same shall be restituted to petitioner by respondent. It goes without saying that CIT (Appeals) shall pass reasoned order on stay application filed by assesse. petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. Order dasti under signatures of Court Master. VIPIN SANGHI, J SANJEEV NARULA, J FEBRUARY 07, 2020 N.Khanna Essjay Ericsson Private Limited v. Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi & Or