Dhodha House v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar and another
[Citation -2020-LL-0205-53]

Citation 2020-LL-0205-53
Appellant Name Dhodha House
Respondent Name Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar and another
Court HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 05/02/2020
Assessment Year 1989-90
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 71/1994 relating to A.Y. 1989-90. Learned counsel for the appellant is not in a position to deny the fact that the facts of the case are covered by the decision of this Court passed in ITA No. 50-2000 decided on 28.2.2014 titled as M/s Dhodha House, Kotakpura vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar Another and ITA No. 118 of 2001 decided on 19.12.2014 titled as M/s Dhodha House, Kotakpura vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar Another. ANURADHA 2020.02.06 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-119-2001 2 3. The present petition stands dismissed in the same terms as in ITA No. 50-2000 and ITA-118-2001. Since the main case has been decided, the pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE 5.2.2020 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned - Yes/No Whether reportable - Yes/No ANURADHA 2020.02.06 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.


ITA-119-2001 (O&M) 1 IN HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA-119-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : 5.2.2020 M/s. Dhodha House Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar and another Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present : Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Vivek Sethi, Sr. Standing counsel with Mr. Varun Issar, Jr. Standing counsel for respondents. AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) 1. This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') against order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 71 (ASR)/1994 relating to A.Y. 1989-90. 2. Learned counsel for appellant is not in position to deny fact that facts of case are covered by decision of this Court passed in ITA No. 50-2000 decided on 28.2.2014 titled as M/s Dhodha House, Kotakpura vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar & Another and ITA No. 118 of 2001 decided on 19.12.2014 titled as M/s Dhodha House, Kotakpura vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar & Another. ANURADHA 2020.02.06 17:31 I attest to accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-119-2001 (O&M) 2 3. Consequently, present petition stands dismissed in same terms as in ITA No. 50-2000 and ITA-118-2001. 4. Since main case has been decided, pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE (AVNEESH JHINGAN) JUDGE 5.2.2020 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned - Yes/No Whether reportable - Yes/No ANURADHA 2020.02.06 17:31 I attest to accuracy and integrity of this document Dhodha House v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar and another
Report Error