ITXA1603_17.doc IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO.1603 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Pune Appellant Vs. Mather and Platt Pumps Limited Respondent Mr. Sham Walve a/w. Mr. P. Chatterji for Appellant. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN, MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2020 P.C. : Heard Mr. Walve, learned standing counsel Revenue for appellant. 2. This appeal has been preferred under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against order dated 21.10.2016 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Bench "A", Pune in I.T.A.No.1526/PN/ 2011 for assessment year 2004-05. 3. It is submitted that disputed tax effect in present appeal is Rs.40,55,000.00, which is below enhanced prescribed limit as per C.B.D.T. Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019. 4. However, Mr. Walve submits that he has not received any instructions for withdrawal of appeal. 5. Be that as it may, considering fact that disputed tax effect is below prescribed limit, appeal is dismissed on withdrawal. 6. However, if appellant finds that appeal is within any of exceptions under aforesaid Circular, it would be open to appellant to seek revival of appeal. 7. Court fee paid to be refunded as per Rules. Minal V. Digitally signed by Minal V. Parab Date: 2020.02.05 (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.) Parab 17:39:14 +0530 Minal Parab 1/1 Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-5, Pune v. Mather and Platt Pumps Limited