Priya Soparkar 1 4 itxa 906-08-o IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO.906 OF 2008 Commissioner of Income-Tax Central II, Mumbai. Appellant V/s. Shri Bharat S. Shah Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr.Atul K. Jasani i/by Ms.A. Vissanji, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 28, 2020 P.C.:- 1. In this appeal initially Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, learned counsel was standing counsel of Revenue representing appellant. 2. It is submitted that Mr.Sahadevan has expired. 3. We have requested Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned standing counsel, Revenue to assist court in matter. 4. Also heard Mr.Atul K. Jasani, learned counsel for respondent/assessee. ::: Uploaded on - 29/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2020 10:04:45 ::: Priya Soparkar 2 4 itxa 906-08-o 5. It is seen that disputed claim in this appeal is Rs.94,42,134.00. Therefore, tax effect will be below prescribed limit of Rs.1 crore as enhanced by CBDT Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 8th August, 2019. 6. Mr.Suresh Kumar submits that he has not received any instructions from Department. 7. Be that as it may, in light of above, this appeal would stand disposed of as withdrawn. 8. Needless to say, if it is found that case is not covered by aforesaid circular, appellant would be at liberty to move court for revival of appeal. 9. Court fees paid may be refunded as per Rules. (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.) . ::: Uploaded on - 29/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2020 10:04:45 ::: Commissioner of Income-tax Central II, Mumbai v. Bharat S. Shah