The Commissioner of Income-tax Chennai v. N. Murugesan
[Citation -2020-LL-0128-16]
Citation | 2020-LL-0128-16 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | The Commissioner of Income-tax Chennai |
Respondent Name | N. Murugesan |
Court | HIGH COURT OF MADRAS |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 28/01/2020 |
Assessment Year | 1997-98 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | bogus sundry creditors • monetary limit • tax effect |
Bot Summary: | Dt.28.1.2020 in T.C.A.1181/2010 CIT v. N.Murugesan 2/4 following substantial question of law: Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the addition on account of the bogus sundry creditors cannot be sustained on the ground that the Assessing Officer had not allowed the cross examination of the alleged creditors 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Senior Standing Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/-. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed, as withdrawn, keeping open the substantial question of law for determination in appropriate cases. |