Kush Properties & Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax Central Circle 2(1), Pune - 2020-LL-0127-240

Citation	2020-LL-0127-240
Appellant Name	Kush Properties & Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent Name	The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax Central Circle 2(1), Pune
Court	HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	27/01/2020
Assessment Year	1997-98, 1998-99, 1999-00, 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04
Judgment	View Judgment
Bot Summary:	Heard Mr. Rohan Deshpande, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sham Walve, learned standing counsel revenue for the respondent. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2020 10:08:29 ::: Sonali Kilaje 6-ITXA-1715-17.doc 17.03.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Bench A , Pune in ITA No.2073/PUN/2014 for the block period Assessment Years 1997-98 to 2003-04. Learned counsel for the appellant on instructions submits that appellant wants to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Sonali Kilaje 6-ITXA-1715-17.doc IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1715 OF 2017 Kush Properties & Developers Pvt. Ltd. .. Appellant v/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 2(1), Pune .. Respondent Mr. Rohan Deshpande for Appellant. Mr. Sham Walve for Respondent. CORAM: UJJAL BHUYAN, & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 27, 2020. P. C.:- . Heard Mr. Rohan Deshpande, learned counsel for appellant and Mr. Sham Walve, learned standing counsel revenue for respondent. 2. This appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 has been preferred by assessee against order dated 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2020 10:08:29 ::: Sonali Kilaje 6-ITXA-1715-17.doc 17.03.2017 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Bench , Pune in ITA No.2073/PUN/2014 for block period Assessment Years 1997-98 to 2003-04. 3. Learned counsel for appellant on instructions submits that appellant wants to withdraw appeal. 4. Accordingly, appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN,J.) 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2020 10:08:29 ::: Kush Properties & Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax Central Circle 2(1), Pune

Metadata

Judgment