S. G. Asia Holdings (INDIA), Pvt. Ltd. v. The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-4, Mumbai
[Citation -2020-LL-0123-12]

Citation 2020-LL-0123-12
Appellant Name S. G. Asia Holdings (INDIA), Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent Name The Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-4, Mumbai
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 23/01/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect
Bot Summary: The arguments in the matter were heard on 05.08.2019 on which date leave was granted and judgment was reserved. In view of the guidelines issued by the CBDT in Instruction No.3/2003 the Tribunal was right in observing that by not making reference to the TPO, the Assessing Officer had breached the mandatory instructions issued by the CBDT. We do not find the conclusion so arrived at by the Tribunal to be incorrect. The Tribunal ought to have accepted the submission made by the Departmental Representative as quoted in para 16.2 of its order and the matter ought to have been restored to the file of the Assessing Officer so that appropriate reference could be made to the TPO. It would therefore be upto the authorities and the Commissioner concerned to consider the matter in terms Signature Not Verified of Sub-Section of Section 92CA of the Act. We allow this Appeal to the aforesaid Reason: extent and direct that it would now be upto the Assessing Officer to take appropriate steps in terms of Instruction No.3/2003. 2 In this Review Petition it is urged that in view of Circular dated 08.08.2019, benefit ought to be extended in favour of the Review Petitioner as the tax effect in the matter is stated to be less than the limit prescribed in the Circular dated 08.08.2019. Since the matter has been restored to the file of the Assessing Officer so that appropriate reference could be made to the Transfer Pricing Officer, at this stage the benefit of the aforesaid circular dated 08.08.2019 cannot be extended. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.


1 IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.290 OF 2020 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.6144 OF 2019 M/s. S.G. ASIA HOLDINGS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Petitioner VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4, MUMBAI Respondent ORDER This Review Petition is directed against Judgment and Order dated 13.08.2019. arguments in matter were heard on 05.08.2019 on which date leave was granted and judgment was reserved. While disposing of matter it was observed:- 7. In view of guidelines issued by CBDT in Instruction No.3/2003 Tribunal was right in observing that by not making reference to TPO, Assessing Officer had breached mandatory instructions issued by CBDT. We do not find conclusion so arrived at by Tribunal to be incorrect. 8. However, Tribunal ought to have accepted submission made by Departmental Representative as quoted in para 16.2 of its order and matter ought to have been restored to file of Assessing Officer so that appropriate reference could be made to TPO. It would therefore be upto authorities and Commissioner concerned to consider matter in terms Signature Not Verified of Sub-Section (1) of Section 92CA of Act. Digitally signed by MUKESH KUMAR Date: 2020.01.24 13:01:22 IST 9. We, therefore, allow this Appeal to aforesaid Reason: extent and direct that it would now be upto Assessing Officer to take appropriate steps in terms of Instruction No.3/2003. 2 In this Review Petition it is urged that in view of Circular dated 08.08.2019, benefit ought to be extended in favour of Review Petitioner as tax effect in matter is stated to be less than limit prescribed in Circular dated 08.08.2019. Since matter has been restored to file of Assessing Officer so that appropriate reference could be made to Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO), at this stage benefit of aforesaid circular dated 08.08.2019 cannot be extended. Consequently, this Review Petition is dismissed. J. [UDAY UMESH LALIT] .J. [VINEET SARAN] NEW DELHI; JANUARY 23, 2020 3 ITEM NO.1001 SECTION III SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(C) No.290/2020 in C.A. No.6144/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-08-2019 in C.A. No.6144/2019 passed by Supreme Court Of India) M/s. S.G. ASIA HOLDINGS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4, MUMBAI Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 23-01-2020 This petition was circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN By Circulation UPON perusing papers Court made following ORDER Review Petition is dismissed, in terms of Signed Order. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MUKESH NASA) (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER (Signed Order is placed on File) S. G. Asia Holdings (INDIA), Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-4, Mumbai
Report Error