Pr. Commissioner Of Income-tax-Central, Jaipur v. Aacharan Enterprises Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0121-45]

Citation 2020-LL-0121-45
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner Of Income-tax-Central, Jaipur
Respondent Name Aacharan Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 21/01/2020
Assessment Year 2014-15
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags income from business • set off of loss • deemed income • income from other source • brought forward business losses
Bot Summary: This appeal preferred under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against order dated 3.7.17 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur, passed in ITA No.124/Jodh. 2017, whereby an appeal preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 29.12.16 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax CIT for Assessment Year 2014-15, has been dismissed. By order dated 29.12.16, the CIT held that the deemed income of Rs.6,50,00,000 of the respondent assessee is chargeable to tax under the head Income from Other Sources and allowed the intra head adjustment/set off towards the current year business loss to the extent of Rs.3,82,37,792/- and brought forward business loss to the extent of Rs.2,67,62,208/- out of the said income while ITA-4/2018 rejecting the contention of the assessee that the said sums are taxable as income from business or profession. The CIT further held that amendment made by Finance Bill 2016 to the provisions of Section 115BBE of the Act cannot be applied retrospectively. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant contended that the ITAT has seriously erred in holding that the provisions of Section 115BBE of the Act providing that no set off of any loss shall be allowed to the assessee against the deemed income under Section 68, 69, 69A to 69(2), is not applicable to the Assessment Year 2014-15 and thus, set off of the loss allowed to the assessee ignoring the provisions of Section 115BBE is absolutely unjustified. Indisputably, the provisions of Section 115BBE as existed prior to the amendment does not provide that the losses shall not be allowed to be set off against the income referred in Section 115BBE and it is only to dispel the uncertainty prevailing on the issue, the provision was amended. Now vide circular No.11/2019, the CBDT has clarified in unequivocal terms that the term or set off of any loss was inserted vide the Finance Act, 2016 w.e.f. 1.4.17 and therefore, an assessee is entitled to claim set off of loss against the income determined under Section Section 115BBE of the Act till the Assessment Year 2016-17.


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 4/2018 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central, Jaipur. Appellant Versus Aacharan Enterprises Pvt. Ltd having its Registered Office at N.H.8, Lal Madri, Nathdwara, Rajsamand, Rajasthan-313 301 through its Authorized Representative Sanjeev Joshi s/o Shri Trilok Kumar Joshi, aged about 49 years. Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. K.K.Bissa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Mehta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Judgment 21/01/2020 1. This appeal preferred under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short Act ) is directed against order dated 3.7.17 of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur (ITAT), passed in ITA No.124/Jodh./2017, whereby appeal preferred by Revenue against order dated 29.12.16 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT (A)] for Assessment Year 2014-15, has been dismissed. By order dated 29.12.16, CIT (A) held that deemed income of Rs.6,50,00,000 of respondent assessee is chargeable to tax under head Income from Other Sources and allowed intra head adjustment/set off towards current year business loss to extent of Rs.3,82,37,792/- and brought forward business loss to extent of Rs.2,67,62,208/- out of said income while (Downloaded on 25/01/2020 at 10:24:16 AM) (2 of 3) [ITA-4/2018] rejecting contention of assessee that said sums are taxable as income from business or profession. CIT (A) further held that amendment made by Finance Bill 2016 to provisions of Section 115BBE of Act cannot be applied retrospectively. 2. Learned counsel appearing for appellant contended that ITAT has seriously erred in holding that provisions of Section 115BBE of Act providing that no set off of any loss shall be allowed to assessee against deemed income under Section 68, 69, 69A to 69(2), is not applicable to Assessment Year 2014-15 and thus, set off of loss allowed to assessee ignoring provisions of Section 115BBE is absolutely unjustified. 3. On other hand, counsel appearing for respondent contended that provisions of Section 115BBE substituted by Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2016 w.e.f. 1.4.17 cannot be applied to Assessment Year 2014-15 inasmuch as, same shall be applicable only to Assessment Year 2017-18 onwards and thus, ITAT has committed no error in affirming order passed by CIT (A). Learned counsel submitted that as matter of fact, vide circular No.11/2019, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has already clarified term set off any loss which was specifically inserted only vide Finance Act, 2016 w.e.f. 1.4.17 and assessee is entitled to claim set off of loss against income determined under Section 115BBE of Act till Assessment Year 2016-17 and therefore, contention sought to be raised on behalf of Revenue is absolutely unjustified. 4. We have considered submissions of learned counsel and perused material on record. (Downloaded on 25/01/2020 at 10:24:16 AM) (3 of 3) [ITA-4/2018] 5. Indisputably, provisions of Section 115BBE as existed prior to amendment does not provide that losses shall not be allowed to be set off against income referred in Section 115BBE and it is only to dispel uncertainty prevailing on issue, provision was amended. bare perusal of provisions makes it abundantly clear that it cannot be applied retrospectively. Moreover, now vide circular No.11/2019, CBDT has clarified in unequivocal terms that term or set off of any loss was inserted vide Finance Act, 2016 w.e.f. 1.4.17 and therefore, assessee is entitled to claim set off of loss against income determined under Section Section 115BBE of Act till Assessment Year 2016-17. It is further clarified that pending assessment and litigation on this issue shall be handled accordingly. In this view of matter, contention sought to be raised by Revenue as aforesaid, cannot be countenanced by this Court. 6. No other ground is pressed by appellant before this Court. 7. Consequently, appeal preferred by Revenue is dismissed. No order as to costs. (PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (SANGEET LODHA),J 55-Aditya/- (Downloaded on 25/01/2020 at 10:24:16 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Pr. Commissioner Of Income-tax-Central, Jaipur v. Aacharan Enterprises Pvt. Ltd
Report Error