Scorpia India Medicare Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-tax, Ghaziabad
[Citation -2020-LL-0121-19]

Citation 2020-LL-0121-19
Appellant Name Scorpia India Medicare Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent Name Dy. Commissioner Of Income-tax, Ghaziabad
Court HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 21/01/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags commission expenses • remand order
Bot Summary: A plain reading of the judgment and order dated 16th August, 2016, passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi BenchG, New Delhi, clearly reveals that the appeal preferred by the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes only. The learned advocate representing the appellant before us strenuously contends that the learned Tribunal, while setting aside the whole issue of allowability of commission expenses back to the file of the assessing officer to decide the issue afresh after examination of the parties, travelled beyond its jurisdiction inasmuch as this order gave an opportunity to the assessing officer to enhance the assessment made in the original order. In this context, the learned advocate for the appellant has referred to and relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court rendered in the case of MCorp Global Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad, 309 ITR 434. The reason is, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in that case, inter alia, to the effect, that the Tribunal was not authorised to take back the benefit granted to the assessee by the assessing officer. In the facts of the instant case, the learned Tribunal has not passed any such order. It has merely set aside the whole issue of the allowability of the commission expenses back to the file of the assessing officer only for the purpose of deciding the issue afresh after examination of the parties. That apart and in any event, the learned Tribunal has clearly observed that the appeal of the revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes only.


(1) Court No. - 7 Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 67 of 2017 Appellant :- Scorpia India Medicare Pvt. Ltd. Ghaziabad Respondent :- Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ghaziabad Counsel for Appellant :- Abhinav Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Gaurav Mahajan Hon'ble Biswanath Somadder,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. This appeal appears to have been admitted on 21st February, 2017, without formulating any substantial question of law, which is mandated under section 260-A (3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (as amended till date). plain reading of judgment and order dated 16th August, 2016, passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench"G", New Delhi, clearly reveals that appeal preferred by Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes only. learned advocate representing appellant before us strenuously contends that learned Tribunal, while setting aside whole issue of allowability of commission expenses back to file of assessing officer to decide issue afresh after examination of parties, travelled beyond its jurisdiction inasmuch as this order gave opportunity to assessing officer to enhance assessment made in original order. In this context, learned advocate for appellant has referred to and relied on judgment of Supreme Court rendered in case of MCorp Global Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad, (2009) 309 ITR 434 (SC). bare perusal of said judgment reveals that same has no manner of application at all in facts and circumstances of (2) instant case. reason is, Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in that case, inter alia, to effect, that Tribunal was not authorised to take back benefit granted to assessee by assessing officer. In facts of instant case, learned Tribunal has not passed any such order. It has merely set aside whole issue of allowability of commission expenses back to file of assessing officer only for purpose of deciding issue afresh after examination of parties. That apart and in any event, learned Tribunal has clearly observed that appeal of revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes only. In such circumstances as stated above, we do not find any substantial question of law is required to be formulated by us and appeal stands disposed of in terms of observation made hereinabove. Order Date :- 21.1.2020 Imroz/Ravi (Biswanath Somadder, J.) (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.) Scorpia India Medicare Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-tax, Ghaziabad
Report Error