IN HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI I.T.A. NO.128 OF 2009 BETWEEN: MS. DEEPA S. PAI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS D/O SRI. T. SUDHAKARA PAI No.5, CHITRAKALA ANANTHANAGAR, MANIPAL-576104 REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MRS. JAYA S. PAI. APPELLANT (By Sri. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.) AND: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-1, CANARA TOWERS OPP. TALUK OFFICE, UDUPI. RESPONDENT (By Sri. E.I. SANMATHI, ADV.) THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 14/11/2008 PASSED IN ITA NO.334/BNG/2008, FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05, PRAYING TO FORMULATE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. ALLOW APPEAL AND SET ASIDE ORDER PASSED BY ITAT 2 BANGALORE IN ITA NO.334/BNG/2008 DATED 14/11/2008 IN INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr.S.Parthasarathi, learned counsel for appellant. Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for respondent. 2. This appeal under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act , for short) has been filed by assessee. 3. Bench of this Court had admitted appeal on 04.08.2009. Admittedly, in pursuance of order of remand passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, fresh order has been passed which is subject matter of challenge in ITA No.69/2015. Therefore, issues 3 involved in this appeal are rendered academic which we do not propose to decide. In result, appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE RV Deepa S. Pai v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle-1, Udupi