The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Ludhiana v. Genex Industries Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0115-85]
Citation | 2020-LL-0115-85 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Ludhiana |
Respondent Name | Genex Industries Ltd. |
Court | HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 15/01/2020 |
Assessment Year | 2012-13 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | commercial expediency • transfer of interest • interest free loan • business purpose • interest free fund • interest on borrowed fund • interest free advance |
Bot Summary: | Following substantial questions of law have been claimed: Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of Hon'ble ITAT is perverse as it has ignored the lack of business purpose and commercial expediency of the transaction and decided the issue only on account of availability of interest free funds with the assessee company. MANOJ KUMAR 2020.01.21 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in authenticity of this document High Court,Chandigarh ITA No. 214 of 2019 2 law, the Hon'ble ITAT has erred in confirming the decision of the CIT without examining that the transaction was without any business consideration or commercial expediency and therefore, the interest claimed on borrowed funds was not allowable u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer during assessment proceedings noticed the fact that the assessee had given interest free advances to its group concerns but was claiming interest expenses on borrowed capital. The assessment order dated 31.3.2016 was passed under Section 153A of the Act, disallowing interest claimed under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax partly allowed the appeal vide order dated 22.2.2018, considering the fact that there were sufficient interest free funds available with the assessee from which interest free loan and advances were made. Addition made by disallowing the interest claimed under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Act was set aside. The Tribunal upheld the finding of the Appellate Authority that there were sufficient interest free funds for advancing loan to the group concerns. |