The Commissioner of Income-tax, CIT-8, Mumbai v. Santogen Exports Ltd
[Citation -2020-LL-0109-36]

Citation 2020-LL-0109-36
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax, CIT-8, Mumbai
Respondent Name Santogen Exports Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 09/01/2020
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect
Bot Summary: 397/08, 398/08, 818/08, 954/08, 1905/09, 428/08 Mr. Atul Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA No. 654/08 CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 9 JANUARY 2020 P.C. : On the last date, we had adjourned these appeals at the instance of the learned counsel for the Revenue to enable them to take instructions to withdraw these appeals in terms of Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019 issued by the Central Board for Direct Taxes. Today, the learned Counsel appearing in support of the Appeals state that in spite of their best efforts, no instructions are forthcoming from the Revenue. All of them state that the tax effect involved in all these appeals is less than the threshold limit of Rs. 1.00 crore as provided in the CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019. In the above view, all the Appeals are disposed of in terms of the above Circular. It is made clear that in case the Officers of the Revenue inform the learned Counsel for the Revenue that any of these Appeals are not covered by the above CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019, then the parties are at liberty to move this Court for recall of this order in respect of those appeals.


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 174 OF 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax, CIT-8, Mumbai Appellant V/s. M/s. Santogen Exports Ltd. Respondent. WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 397/2008 398/2008 818/2008 954/2008 1905/2009 428/2008 634/2008 654/2008 Mr. Suresh Kumar for Appellants in ITXA Nos. 174/08, 397/08, 398/08, 818/08, 954/08, 1905/09, 428/08. Shaista Hadi i/b. Charanjeet Chanderpal for Appellant in ITXA No. 634/08. Ms. Sangita Yadav for Appellant in ITXA No. 654/08 Mr. Netaji Gawade for Respondents in ITXA Nos. 397/08, 398/08, 818/08, 954/08, 1905/09, 428/08 Mr. Atul Jasani for Respondent in ITXA No. 654/08 CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 9 JANUARY 2020 P.C. : On last date, we had adjourned these appeals at instance of learned counsel for Revenue to enable them to take instructions to withdraw these appeals in terms of Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019 issued by Central Board for Direct Taxes (CBDT). 2 51. ITXA 174.08.doc 2. Today, learned Counsel appearing in support of Appeals state that in spite of their best efforts, no instructions are forthcoming from Revenue. All of them state that tax effect involved in all these appeals is less than threshold limit of Rs. 1.00 crore as provided in CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019. 3. In above view, all Appeals are disposed of in terms of above Circular. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. 4. However, it is made clear that in case Officers of Revenue inform learned Counsel for Revenue that any of these Appeals are not covered by above CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019, then parties are at liberty to move this Court for recall of this order in respect of those appeals. M.S. KARNIK, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J. Digitally Jyoti signed by Jyoti P. Pawar P. Commissioner of Income-tax, CIT-8, Mumbai v. Santogen Exports Ltd
Report Error