The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax v. Eaton Technologies Private Limited
[Citation -2019-LL-1216-62]

Citation 2019-LL-1216-62
Appellant Name The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax
Respondent Name Eaton Technologies Private Limited
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 16/12/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect
Bot Summary: Mr.P.C.Chhotaray for the Appellant in ITXAL No.1283/2019. P.C. : The learned counsel appearing in support of the appeals, on instructions, seek to withdraw these appeals. This for the reason that the tax effect involved in these appeals is less than the threshold limit of Rs.1 crore as provided in Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 August 2019 which modified the earlier Circular No.3/2018 dated 11 July 2018. Accordingly, all appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3128 OF 2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax. Appellant. V/s. Eaton Technologies Private Limited. Respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NOS. 1090/2019 1091/2019 1105/2019 1134/2019 1206/2019 1213/2019 1283/2019 1806/2019 Mr.Sham Walve for Appellant in ITXA No.3128/2019 and ITXAL Nos.1090, 1091 and 1105/2019. Mr.Tejveer Singh for Appellant in ITXAL Nos.1134 & 1806/19. Mr.A.R.Malhotra for Appellant in ITXAL Nos.1206, 1213/19. Mr.P.C.Chhotaray for Appellant in ITXAL No.1283/2019. Mr.Atul Jasani for Respondent in ITXAL Nos.1105, 1206/19. Ms.Hetal Laghave i/b. S.C.Tiwari for Respondent in ITXAL No.1806/19. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 16 December 2019. P.C. : learned counsel appearing in support of appeals, on instructions, seek to withdraw these appeals. This for reason that tax effect involved in these appeals is less than threshold limit of Rs.1 crore as provided in Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 August 2019 which modified earlier Circular No.3/2018 dated 11 July 2018. Accordingly, all appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. 2. Refund of court fee as per rules. (M.S. KARNIK, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax v. Eaton Technologies Private Limited
Report Error