Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax Central-2 v. Sudhakar M. Shetty
[Citation -2019-LL-1213-38]

Citation 2019-LL-1213-38
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax Central-2
Respondent Name Sudhakar M. Shetty
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 13/12/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect • monetary limit
Bot Summary: P.C. : On the last date, we had adjourned these Appeals at the instance of the learned counsel for the Revenue to enable them to take instructions to withdraw these Appeals in terms of Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019 issued by the Central Board for Direct Taxes. Today, the learned counsel appearing in support of the Urmila Ingale 2 43. Doc Appeals state that in spite of their best efforts, no instructions are forthcoming from the Revenue. All of them state that the tax effect involved in all these Appeals is less than the threshold limit of Rs. 1.00 crore as provided in the CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019. In the above view, all the Appeals are disposed of in terms of the above Circular. It is made clear that in case the Officers of the Revenue inform the learned counsel for the Revenue that any of these Appeals are not covered by the above CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019, then the parties are at liberty to move this Court for recall of this order in respect of those Appeals.


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2279 OF 2019 PR.Commissioner of Income Tax- Central -2 Appellant. V/s. Sudhakar M.Shetty Respondent. WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 2292/2019 2824/2019 2295/2019 2831/2019 2837/2019 Mr.Sham Walve for Appellant in ITXA Nos.2292/2019, 2295/2019, 2824/2019, 2831/2019, 2837/2019. Mr.Suresh Kumar for Appellant in ITXA No. 2279/2019. CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND M.S. KARNIK JJ. DATE : 13 DECEMBER 2019. P.C. : On last date, we had adjourned these Appeals at instance of learned counsel for Revenue to enable them to take instructions to withdraw these Appeals in terms of Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019 issued by Central Board for Direct Taxes (CBDT). 2. Today, learned counsel appearing in support of Urmila Ingale 2 43. itxa 2279.19 instructions.doc Appeals state that in spite of their best efforts, no instructions are forthcoming from Revenue. All of them state that tax effect involved in all these Appeals is less than threshold limit of Rs. 1.00 crore as provided in CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019. 3. In above view, all Appeals are disposed of in terms of above Circular. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. 4. However, it is made clear that in case Officers of Revenue inform learned counsel for Revenue that any of these Appeals are not covered by above CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019, then parties are at liberty to move this Court for recall of this order in respect of those Appeals. (M.S.KARNIK, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) Digitally Urmila signed by Urmila P. Ingle P. Date: 2019.12.16 Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax Central-2 v. Sudhakar M. Shetty
Report Error