Vadayar Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-5, Kottayam / The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kottayam / Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Kochi
[Citation -2019-LL-1213-12]

Citation 2019-LL-1213-12
Appellant Name Vadayar Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
Respondent Name Income-tax Officer, Ward-5, Kottayam / The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kottayam / Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Kochi
Court HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 13/12/2019
Assessment Year 2011-12
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags statutory appeal • assessment order • stay petition • demand notice • time limit • disallowance of deduction
Bot Summary: No.34205 OF 2019(A) 2 JUDGMENT Against Ext.P3 rectified order under the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P4 appeal together with Ext.P5 stay petition before the 3 rd respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that even prior to considering the stay petition, recovery steps are taken by the respondents against the petitioner for recovery of the amounts confirmed by Ext.P3 rectified order. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in the appeal pertains to dis-allowance of deduction claimed under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the Bar and taking note of the fact that in similar matters, this Court has directed the Appellate Authority to consider and pass orders in the appeal and stayed the recovery of disputed amounts pending disposal of the appeal, this Writ petition is disposed directing the 3 rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 appeal within an outer time limit of six months. Recovery steps pursuant to Ext.P3 order for recovery of amounts confirmed against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by the 3 rd respondent as directed above and communicated to the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment together with a copy of the writ petition before the 3 rd respondent for further action.


IN HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1941 WP(C).No.34205 OF 2019(A) PETITIONER/S: VADAYAR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.266 VADAYAR P.O., THALAYOLAPARAMBU P.O. KOTAYAM-686605 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.R.SAJI BY ADVS. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.R.SREEJITH SHRI.GOKULRAJ L. SMT. ARYA ANIL SMT.SRI HARINI S.P. RESPONDENT/S: 1 INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5 KOTTAYAM-686001 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) KOTTAYAM - 686001 3 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOCHI - 682037 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.12.2019, COURT ON SAME DAY DELIVERED FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.34205 OF 2019(A) 2 JUDGMENT Against Ext.P3 rectified order under Income Tax Act, petitioner has preferred Ext.P4 appeal together with Ext.P5 stay petition before 3 rd respondent. It is case of petitioner that even prior to considering stay petition, recovery steps are taken by respondents against petitioner for recovery of amounts confirmed by Ext.P3 rectified order. It is stated by learned counsel for petitioner that issue involved in appeal pertains to dis-allowance of deduction claimed under Section 80P of Income Tax Act. 2. I have heard learned counsel appearing for petitioner and also learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents. On consideration of facts and circumstances of case as also submissions made across Bar and taking note of fact that in similar matters, this Court has directed Appellate Authority to consider and pass orders in appeal and stayed recovery of disputed amounts pending disposal of appeal, this Writ petition is disposed directing 3 rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 appeal within outer time limit of six months. Recovery steps pursuant to Ext.P3 order for recovery of amounts confirmed against petitioner shall be kept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by 3 rd respondent as directed above and communicated to petitioner. petitioner shall produce copy of this judgment together with copy of writ petition before 3 rd respondent for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE sd WP(C).No.34205 OF 2019(A) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT. P1 TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR A.Y.2011-12 DATED 10.01.2014 EXT P2 COPY OF ORDER DATED 28.02.2018 PASSED BY 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P3 COPY OF ORDER U/S.154 READ WITH SECTION 250 OF ACT DATED 30.09.2019 EXT.P4 COPY OF STATUTORY APPEAL FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR A.Y.2011-12 EXT.P5 COPY OF STAY PETITION FOR YEAR 2011-12 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P6 COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED FOR A.Y.2011-12 ISSUD BY FIRST RESPONDENT sd Vadayar Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-5, Kottayam / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Kottayam / Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Kochi
Report Error