Commissioner of Income-tax, exemption v. Balasore Law College
[Citation -2019-LL-1211-41]

Citation 2019-LL-1211-41
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax, exemption
Respondent Name Balasore Law College
Court HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 11/12/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags grant registration • charitable trust • mou
Bot Summary: By way of this appeal the Income Tax Department has challenged the order dated 15.02.2017 passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in ITA No.459/CTK/2015 vide Annexure-2, allowing the appeal preferred by the assessee-respondent. Learned Tribunal while allowing the appeal at paragraph-6 of its order dated 15.02.2017 has observed as under: 6. Ld A.R. of the assessee has filed the decision of the Mumbai E Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Tara Educational and Charitable Trust wherein, the Tribunal has allowed registration on similar facts of the case. Ld D.R. could not show any good reason to not to follow the above quoted order of the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal. Respectfully following the decision of the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Tara Educational and Charitable Trust, we set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income, Hyderabad and direct him to grant registration u/s.12AA of the Act and approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act. Considering the submission made and keeping in view the observations made by the learned Tribunal as quoted above, -2- we are in complete agreement with the view taken by the learned Tribunal in the impugned order and find no case is made out to interfere with the same. The appeal, being devoid of merits, deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed.


ITA No.6 of 2017 03. 11.12.2019 Heard Mr. R.S. Chiminka, learned Sr. Standing Counsel along with Shri A. Kedia, learned Standing Counsel for appellant-Income Tax Department. 2. By way of this appeal Income Tax Department has challenged order dated 15.02.2017 passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in ITA No.459/CTK/2015 vide Annexure-2, allowing appeal preferred by assessee-respondent. 3. Perused impugned order in detail. Learned Tribunal while allowing appeal at paragraph-6 of its order dated 15.02.2017 has observed as under: 6. We find that in instant case, registration of society u/s.12AA was rejected by CIT (Exemptions) on ground that as seen from MOU, amendment clause does not specifically stipulate that amendments shall be carried out only with prior approval of CIT (Exemptions). Similarly, winding up clause does not specifically stipulate that on winding up of society, remaining assets shall be transferred/ paid to institution having registration u/s.12AA and approval u/s.80G(5) of I.T. Act, 1961. Ld A.R. of assessee has filed decision of Mumbai E Bench of Tribunal in case of Tara Educational and Charitable Trust (supra) wherein, Tribunal has allowed registration on similar facts of case. Ld D.R. could not show any good reason to not to follow above quoted order of Mumbai Bench of Tribunal. Therefore, respectfully following decision of Mumbai Bench of Tribunal in case of Tara Educational and Charitable Trust (supra), we set aside order of Commissioner of Income (Exemptions), Hyderabad and direct him to grant registration u/s.12AA of Act and approval u/s.80G(5) of Act. 4. Considering submission made and keeping in view observations made by learned Tribunal as quoted above, -2- we are in complete agreement with view taken by learned Tribunal in impugned order and find no case is made out to interfere with same. 5. Hence, appeal, being devoid of merits, deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. All connected Misc. Case(s)/I.A(s) if any, is/are accordingly dismissed. . ....... ( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice .. (K.R.Mohapatra) Akk Judge Commissioner of Income-tax, exemption v. Balasore Law College
Report Error