Thekkinian Poulose Varkey v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-2 (1), Thrissur
[Citation -2019-LL-1211-29]
Citation | 2019-LL-1211-29 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Thekkinian Poulose Varkey |
Respondent Name | The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-2 (1), Thrissur |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 11/12/2019 |
Assessment Year | 2017-18 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | sufficient opportunity • acknowledgement of • alternative remedy • extension of time • assessment order • reasonable time • natural justice • non-compliance • in relation to • recovery proceeding |
Bot Summary: | No.33499/19 2 JUDGMENT The challenge in the writ petition is to Ext.P3 assessment order passed in relation to the petitioner under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2017-18. In the writ petition, it is the case of the petitioner that Ext.P3 assessment order was passed without affording an effective opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and that it was passed within a day after the submission of Ext.P2 reply by the petitioner. The learned Standing Counsel would submit that the notice inviting objections to the proposal for assessment had been served as early as on 03.10.2019 and the petitioner was called upon to furnish details to clarify the doubts raised by the department. Responding to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, that a request for extension of time had been preferred before the respondent, it is clarified that, although a request was made on 11.10.2019 for extension of time to W.P.(C). On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the Bar, I find force in the contention of the learned counsel for the respondent that Ext.P3 order was passed after giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to prefer his objections to the queries raised by the department, and after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before completing the assessment. Taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that he would require some time to move the appellate authority, I direct that recovery proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3 assessment order shall be kept in abeyance for a period of three weeks so as to enable the petitioner to W.P.(C). The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the respondent for further action. |