Udupi District Tappers Co-operative Federation Ltd. v. Prl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Mangaluru / Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Centralized Processing Centre, Bengaluru / Income-tax Officer, Ward-2, Udupi
[Citation -2019-LL-1210-45]
Citation | 2019-LL-1210-45 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Udupi District Tappers Co-operative Federation Ltd. |
Respondent Name | Prl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Mangaluru / Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Centralized Processing Centre, Bengaluru / Income-tax Officer, Ward-2, Udupi |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 10/12/2019 |
Assessment Year | 2018-19 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | co-operative societies act • condonation of delay • co-operative society • income |
Bot Summary: | The petitioner has challenged the order dated 31/05/2019 passed by the second respondent and the order dated 21/06/2019 passed by the first respondent inter alia seeking a direction to the third respondent to pass the order of assessment relating to the assessment year 2018-19 in accordance with law. The petitioner has filed its returns relating to the assessment year 2018-19 with a delay of 86 days. The first respondent has rejected the application filed by the petitioner for condonation of delay in submitting the returns. The learned counsel appearing for both the parties would submit that the issued involved herein, is no more res integra, in view of the order 4 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Balkuru Halu Uthpadakara Sahakari Sangha Ltd., -vs- Prl. Commissioner of Income Tax and Others in Writ Petition No.28871/2019 and allied matters, whereby this Court has set aside the order impugned therein remanding the matter to the third respondent for re- examination of the petitioner s claim with regard to their respective returns and for condonation of delay in the light of the decision of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in the case of Fibrefill Engineers Vs CIT, reported in 177 TJ 556. For the reasons stated in the aforesaid order, the present writ petition deserves to be disposed of in similar terms. The order at Annexure-C dated 21/06/2019 passed by the first respondent is set aside and the matter is remanded to the first respondent to re-consider the application submitted by the petitioner, in the light of the order of this Court referred to above. The writ petition stands disposed of, in terms of the above. |