Assistant Director of Income-tax (INV) v. Yashovardhan Birla & Anr
[Citation -2019-LL-1202-41]

Citation 2019-LL-1202-41
Appellant Name Assistant Director of Income-tax (INV)
Respondent Name Yashovardhan Birla & Anr.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 02/12/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags competent authority • interim order
Bot Summary: The Trial Court Vide Order dated 12.04.2018 allowed the said application filed by the petitioner-Department and on 13.04.2018 signed the Letter of Request. The High Court vide Order dated 05.07.2018 observed that the respondent ought to have been given an opportunity before passing such an order by the Trial Court and allowed the writ petition giving following directions: Writ Petition is partly allowed. The matter is remanded back to the trial court for hearing the application preferred by the respondent afresh. In the meantime, without prejudice to the rights/objections of both the parties and subject to the decision of the trial court in the application preferred by the respondent NO.1, the amount in the entities which is subject matter of the application preferred by the respondent no.1 may not be transferred to any other account; All points raised in this petition are kept open; 3 It is clarified that this Court has not made any observations on merits of the case and the trial Court shall decide the proceedings in accordance with law; The parties through their counsel to appear before the trial Court on 1st August, 2018. The application be decided expeditiously; When the special leave petition came up for hearing on 04.07.2019, it was clarified by this Court that in the interim order passed by the High Court on 05.7.2018 in para(iii) the words may not be transferred to any other account shall be read as shall not be transferred to any other account. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the above clarification, as ordered by this Court by Order dated 04.07.2019 shall be treated to be continued and the parties be granted liberty to go before the Trial Court. The clarification made by this Court on 04.07.2019, as above, shall remain continued till the disposal of the application by the concerned Trial Court.


SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5834/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-07-2018 in CRLWP No. 2143/2018 passed by High Court Of Judicature At Bombay) ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV) Petitioner(s) VERSUS YASHOVARDHAN BIRLA & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.29871/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 02-12-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni,ASG Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra,Adv. Mr. S.S. Ray,Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddhartha Dave,Sr.Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Delay condoned. Being aggrieved by order passed by High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Writ Petition No.2143 of 2018 dated 05.07.2018, Assistant Director of Income Tax has preferred this special leave petition. We have heard Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for petitioner-Department and Mr. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MAHABIR SINGH Siddhartha Date: 2019.12.04 15:55:16 IST Reason: Dave, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent. In criminal case initiated against respondent for offences punishable under Sections 181, 186, 191 & 193 I.P.C. and 2 Section 277 of Income Tax Act, 1961, petitioner-Department filed application on 09.04.2018 before 38 th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate seeking to issue letter of request to competent authority of Bailiwick of Guernsey requesting them to carry out specific investigation in respect of entities from which respondent was alleged to have transferred funds/assets based in States of Guernsey and for further relief. Trial Court Vide Order dated 12.04.2018 allowed said application filed by petitioner-Department and on 13.04.2018 signed Letter of Request. Being aggrieved, respondent filed writ petition before High Court. High Court vide Order dated 05.07.2018 observed that respondent ought to have been given opportunity before passing such order by Trial Court and allowed writ petition giving following directions: (i) Writ Petition is partly allowed. (ii) Impugned order dated 12th April, 2018 and order issuing Letter of Request dated 13th April, 2018 are hereby set aside. matter is remanded back to trial court for hearing application preferred by respondent afresh. petitioner be afforded opportunity of hearing application preferred by respondent no.1. (iii) In meantime, without prejudice to rights/objections of both parties and subject to decision of trial court in application preferred by respondent NO.1, amount in entities which is subject matter of application preferred by respondent no.1 may not be transferred to any other account; (iv) All points raised in this petition are kept open; 3 (v) It is clarified that this Court has not made any observations on merits of case and trial Court shall decide proceedings in accordance with law; (vi) parties through their counsel to appear before trial Court on 1st August, 2018. application be decided expeditiously; When special leave petition came up for hearing on 04.07.2019, it was clarified by this Court that in interim order passed by High Court on 05.7.2018 in para (8)(iii) words may not be transferred to any other account shall be read as shall not be transferred to any other account . Learned counsel for parties have submitted that above clarification, as ordered by this Court by Order dated 04.07.2019 shall be treated to be continued and parties be granted liberty to go before Trial Court. Having regard to submissions made at Bar, special leave petition is disposed of giving liberty to parties to raise all contentions before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 38th Court, Ballard Pier, Mumbai. In meanwhile, clarification made by this Court on 04.07.2019, as above, shall remain continued till disposal of application by concerned Trial Court. It is made clear that Trial Court shall consider matter without being influenced by any of views expressed by High Court. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (MAHABIR SINGH) (BEENA JOLLY) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER Assistant Director of Income-tax (INV) v. Yashovardhan Birla & Anr
Report Error