Commissioner of Income-tax v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-1120-69]

Citation 2019-LL-1120-69
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax
Respondent Name Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 20/11/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags low tax effect
Bot Summary: Counsel for the respondent submits that the tax amount involved in this appeal is insignificant, which is apparent from the question of law formulated by the High Court, as well as statement made at page B of the appeal paper-book. Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the senior counsel is unavailable being busy in some other Court and prays for time. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the instructions issued by the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance vide F.No. 116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019, due to low tax effect. For M/S. Karanjawala Co., AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER Counsel for the respondent submits that the tax amount involved in this appeal is insignificant, which is apparent from the question of law formulated by the High Court, as well as statement made at page B of the appeal paper-book. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the instructions issued by the Department of Revenue, 3 Ministry of Finance vide F.No.


1 IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4417 OF 2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPELLANT(S) VERSUS TORRENT PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. RESPONDENT(S) ORDER 1. Counsel for respondent submits that tax amount involved in this appeal is insignificant, which is apparent from question of law formulated by High Court, as well as statement made at page B of appeal paper-book. 2. Counsel appearing for appellant submits that senior counsel is unavailable being busy in some other Court and prays for time. We reject this request. 3. appeal, however, is disposed of in terms of instructions issued by Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance vide F.No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019, due to low tax effect. 4. All pending applications are disposed of. ,J. (A.M. KHANWILKAR) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by CHARANJEET KAUR Date: 2019.11.22 15:22:17 IST Reason: .,J. (DINESH MAHESHWARI) NEW DELHI NOVEMBER, 20, 2019 2 ITEM NO.105 COURT NO.7 SECTION III SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4417/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Appellant(s) VERSUS TORRENT PHARMACEUTICAL LTD. Respondent(s) Date : 20-11-2019 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Appellant(s) Mr. Dhruv Agarwal, Sr. Adv. (Not Present) *Mr. Adv. Ms. Priyanka, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Amar Dave, Adv. Ms. Nandini Gore, Adv. Ms. Sonia Nigam, Adv. Mr. Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Karanveer Singh Anand, Adv. Mr. Jasvir Singh Sabarwal, Adv. For M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Counsel for respondent submits that tax amount involved in this appeal is insignificant, which is apparent from question of law formulated by High Court, as well as statement made at page B of appeal paper-book. Counsel appearing for appellant submits that senior counsel is unavailable being busy in some other Court and prays for time. We reject this request. appeal, however, is disposed of in terms of instructions issued by Department of Revenue, 3 Ministry of Finance vide F.No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019, due to low tax effect. All pending applications are disposed of. (NEETU KHAJURIA) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER *Appearance not given. Commissioner of Income-tax v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Report Error